The law of construction is finally in hand.

Question 1: section 1.2 of the first chapter presents software engineering including requirements analysis, software design, software construction, software testing and software maintenance. So how to do detailed needs analysis? Have you ever talked to a friend about demand analysis, or did you write this in a specific position on the team? Do you need to know how to write code if you are a person in a specific position? Understanding the customer's intentions, writing documents is not good? Maybe people who don't understand the whole process profile can't write demand analysis? But isn't that a position that makes perfect practice more of an experience? (Sorry to be a computer idiot.) Can only ask this question)

Question 2: That is the problem that comes with it. Since a mature team is a clear division of labor. It's just that the team is moving and it's mission-leveling, is that all the content of our entire process is required to be proficient? The book also says that software engineering covers a wide range of content. Does purposeful learning seem more important?

Question 3: It is true that the book fills the gap between schools and software engineering jobs, but will such a cut of training or education methods not apply to a subset of groups? As the pupils face a lot of homework bombing, they do not want to write their own industry, directly to help parents, or early to the school to copy other people. In that case, what is the role?

Question 4: I would like to make an examination of civil servants ' Affairs. So what can I bring with this book?

Question 5: This book describes the importance of teamwork. There are a number of methodologies available. As far as I know. Learning this behavior is the process of understanding, practicing, re-understanding, and then practicing. The individual diversity of each student is very large. Does this book really apply to everyone?

The above is my question. I don't know if my question is too obvious, but obviously I'm quite confused about it.

The law of construction is finally in hand.