With the depth of reading, more and more confused, "The Law of construction" look out Xin Zou teacher very attentively to explain some model methods, team mode and so on, personally, for the people who have not practiced, the light look at these things seems useless, and even follow Xin Zou Teacher's learning by Doing idea, our group of "mob" choose how to structure the software model is also a problem, especially the teacher proposed a lot of methods built on the VSTS TFS above, in fact, although we are 985 schools, as far as our math major does not seem to have these things, And let my teammates accept these things (mainly vs download use, teachers are used codeblocks) in fact, they are very expensive, they do not want to take the computer direction is not the power I think it is not very appropriate to force them to spend their time in this area (the actual sentence is a problem, want to complete the software build, This is a must. But I have doubts about the success of this matter. ）
So it seems that the role of the "Law of construction" is more like a reference book, in accordance with a number of models put in, obviously I think Xin Zou teacher is not the meaning. Maybe this book is too abstract for me now. Understand in fact can understand the so-called truth, but the use of this book for the present I formed the team, I personally not very optimistic about the completion of. (This kind of group is very difficult to suffer, I barely counted a leg, but the actual sucks I know, but just a few legs, can only separate with a little other people, the purpose of others is very simple, mixed the past is good, so it is difficult to do. ）
Today's Harvest:
- P141 full authorization and trust. From the above, I still have a natural distrust of the members of the feeling, this may be related to some of their own experience, it is difficult to believe that others, at the time of reflection, in writing this thing is really repeated, how to build trust?
- P145 Business Projects need to focus on the market and users, technology is in the third place. In fact, this sentence is to understand what is the core of doing a thing! I am a technology-oriented science and engineering male, do what things want to use some so-called new techniques, willing to try new things, but often mastered the not ripe and eventually lead to low scores, but I always comfort myself. In fact, this let me face a bit of my own weakness, input and harvest is not proportional. As an example: The last two weeks of college review I am always a result-oriented, to see things of interest, I feel valuable things. Not to memorize something. But now the university exam to tell the truth like to test these, although we are 985 university, but really sucks and sucks. How to say, now I am at the boundary point of the insurance research, may be able to protect the research can be, those high scores of people? (most girls) a lot of people are relying on cheating, rote, to find a topic (our college like the original problem ...) ) to get a high score. How to say, a group of English is very bad people, rote learning and cheat of the people who are eligible for insurance research? (Of course, there are people who are very impressed, very rare.) Of course, this paragraph is a bit of a heart, also blame oneself freshman time too wave, study very poor.
- Functional Analysis Four quadrants I am using, anyway I feel very good, this year I think improved a lot of learning methods, at present is good, but must persist! My willpower feeling is not very strong, refueling.
- The advice of the Master of Management: Those entrepreneurs who-start out with the idea, they ' ll make it big-and in a hurry-can be guaranteed FA Ilure. I like to start off with a very big idea, and in the end, I often find it impossible to solve the problem (and do more harm than good) and make it smaller. Not only a waste of time has not been expected to harvest.
- PM This chapter does not have any idea, oneself is not very interested. See the past, but Xin Zou teacher a lot of words or deep into my heart, such as now many large enterprises pm (or other staff, small boss) do not seek active but do not have, muddle through, their own interests is good.
The law of construction read 3
