The truth that leads the blind in the face of problems-Leo jianshu 26

In QQ, the book reviewer mentioned "how to write book reviews ?" Some friends think that writing like a catalog introduction is desirable. Some friends say that novel reviews have their own writing methods, and some friends plan to use book reviews to show all suspense novels, I think that "writing something that can touch me and helping readers in the book" is a good book review. Later I mentioned "the value of Book Reviewers", one of which should be: saving readers time to tell them which books are actually not worth the time (such book reviews recommend friends to "judge the United States" to say "impotence" to the United States, rather than "impotence" to say "strong Yang" to themselves "); second, while enjoying the pleasure of reading, we try our best not to let any valuable book be read because of propaganda issues (limited resources for publishing houses) and Schedule issues (too many key books in the same period) being ignored by readers, this is the social responsibility of a book reviewer! I recommend "Know You Don't Know" in the hope that it can be seen by more people.


The book commented on a mental model "train of thought and method for correct Problem Discovery", and clearly introduced the implementation steps in seven or seven steps. After reading the contents, I immediately contacted the editor to apply for a sample book. The book is worth reading, the logic structure is rigorous, and there are many examples, from 911, Vietnam War, hospital ambulance, to plane crash (how did the best driver in the United States cause the death of hundreds of people by mistake? After that, CRM (Unit Resource Management) was launched) method ). I have made more than 30 Reading Notes, and the biggest inspiration for me is "the truth that leads the blind in front of the problem ".


Many employees of the company have the idea of looking forward to Mingjun and expect to lead the famous and famous people, but the leaders are always surrounded by villains and loyal ministers. It is like conspiracy analysts are analyzing them. Unknown to you:

1. Information may be filtered out in good faith. People do not want to waste valuable time on leadership. Most of them only report the key points.
2. What we say is different from what we say: Sociology proved this problem as early as the 20th century. Therefore, leaders must learn to observe.
3. Due to the limitations of previous success stories, the book describes examples of the failure of successfully copying office supplies to the dry-cleaning service. The leaders only noticed that the two sides were the same and did not notice the difference.
4. Leaders intentionally block negative information. In this example, the US military rescued a prisoner of war in the Vietnam War and killed more than 100 people in the last empty camp. At that time, the US president hoped to execute the operation, the subordinates took the initiative to ignore the empty information of the war camp.


Any two of the above four features is enough to make the wise man blind in the face of problems. I have seen many leaders have at least four of them.

How can we solve this problem and allow the leaders to seek help?
I hope you will have time to read and learn the wisdom and experience of the solution.