The website mechanism also includes political principles. You can learn wiki in the blog community.

This is a small impression. When I design the homepage of the blog Park today, it seems that you have a lot of controversy over the homepage mechanism. In fact, on the Internet, the shelf is normal. Websites that are most likely to cause user disagreements should, of course, be wikipedia. wikipedia has a set of smart solutions to resolve disputes, which is a microcosm of a democratic political system. This article does not discuss from the technical point of view.

 

The wording of WIKI text is like a rigorous and rational scholar or lawyer, but the wording is very appealing, unlike the "machine language" we see on other sites ". The entire "Guidelines and Guidelines" are very complicated and analyzed in different articles. They fulfill the Wiki's values, principles, and spirit. If I write a website statement in the future, I will certainly learn from it.

 

From the perspective of appreciation, many words in the text are very interesting, and many ways of speaking are also very interesting. Here are some excerpts for everyone to play.

The three basic content guidelines of Wikipedia are as follows:"Neutral view", "available for verification", and "non-original research ".

Neutral, also known as the NPOV principle. Wikipedia says:"People have their own opinions. Although everything you see is what I see, what you think is different-your point of view may be just one of the many possible points of view."Wikipedia comprehensively and deeply explains the necessity of neutral and solutions. We suggest that people in different regions, religions, classes, knowledge reserves, and ideology should be inclusive. Wikipedia also encourages people with different opinions to debate, but the premise of the debate is that everyone maintains absolute rationality and respects others. The most important thing is to respect facts. The fact is that the Wikipedia statement can be circled.Asserted facts, including facts about the viewpoint-but do not assert the viewpoint itself."

It is worth mentioning that Wikipedia encourages you to debate, but prohibits you from voting on any controversial issues. Because"A few strong resolutions are obvious mistakes. However, most resolutions are confusing. In a highly controversial situation, most people agree that it is not a real democracy, but a disguised form of violence. "Most violent democracy" does not solve the problem. Instead, it gives people a temporary illusion, breeds more problems, and influences the creation of Wikipedia."-- On the other hand, we often stick to the" minority obeying the majority ", which is always regarded as the fastest solution, this kind of "with the big stream", "Herd", "Eyes of the masses are bright", "win for the majority of people, isolate a few people", is more violent to others than yourself.

Wikipedia depicts a "Pyramid" of debate performance. A speculative person can only stay on the top three layers. Many people are asked to consciously position and reflect on themselves:

Wikipedia also advocates the use of "effective" languages, insteadFlashyLanguage. Example:"One of the most influential ......" "Famous ......" "Important ......" "Something that cannot be ignored ......" "Indisputable ......" "It is worth mentioning that ......"This is a shame, and now I cannot use these words.

In short, there are too many slang in this series of "Policies and Guidelines. I strongly recommend that you do not have a sound set of values, be brainwashed so badly, get the information right away, be proud of being biased, and be ashamed of being neutral (these words are not in line with Wikipedia ). spirit, is the style of my "person eating )...... To read Wikipedia's "Guidelines and Guidelines ". In fact, I would like to recommend everyone to read it. Because we have all of the above symptoms, especially on the network.

When Google left China in the past, a netizen once wrote an article about Google's values. Everyone and each group have their own values. But I think we should have some public values above this, so that we can ensure that all values can exist with dignity. Therefore, a website should establish a public value for users. This value also reflects the temperament and spirit of a website.