This site thinks Ubuntu should stay away from Debian

Because many configuration files have been renamed, such as/boot/grub. conf seems to have changed to/boot/grub. although cfg is relatively small, it may affect compatibility. Most linux and unix use. conf to change the configuration file name to. cfg. Although all deb packages are used, debian's apt-get package management system is used. However, Ubu

Because many configuration files have been renamed, such as/boot/grub. conf seems to have changed to/boot/grub. although cfg is relatively small, it may affect compatibility. Most linux and unix use. conf to change the configuration file name to. cfg.

Although all deb packages are used, debian's apt-get package management system is used. However, Ubuntu has its own software center, which is dedicated to software and ubuntu. Many cannot be used directly in debian.

Many people say that ubuntu has stolen the fruits of debian's work. I didn't feel it before, but now I think so. But to be honest, it's good to try ubuntu. However, I still feel inferior. Grub. cfg: grub2 and grub1 seems to be used in debian. In fact, GRUB is also used in slackware. It is generally 0. 97 .,, In ORA, grub. conf is used.

Fedora then debian, and then ubuntu.

It's just a personal opinion. It's no big deal. This problem occurs only when ubuntu is a debian desktop version and grub2 is a new version. Originated from debian, it does not have to be the same as debian. it is only based on the same package management mechanism. it has its own characteristics: Wang daoen, same as above ...... Why?

Can I open a restaurant without my son?

On the contrary, this is the honor of debian. this popular release is based on its development of ubuntu, but it was originally based on debian, and ubuntu was updated a lot later, as far as I know, debian updates have been slow grub menus. lst and grub. conf is a file

Grub2 is grub. cfg

You can also install grub2 in debian.

In my opinion, ubuntu is used, not for learning. Caicai Cainiao floated over new people to report that this is not compatible! To look ahead, you can make a hard link to grub. cfg.

The biggest advantage of ubuntu is its ease of use. it cannot be said that ubuntu is far away from debian, and it is completely negated. debian lacks ease of use. ubuntu can just make up for this.

If ubuntu steals the results of debian's work, almost all open-source applications are like this-debian Linux steals the results of linus's work and linus steals minix's work, rhel "steals" fedora's Labor results, gentoo and debian's kfreebsd "steals" freebsd's Labor results, openbsd "steals" netbsd's Labor results, and suse "steals" slackware's Labor results, the derivative versions of ubuntu "steal" the Labor results of ubuntu.

Therefore, we should not be too excited to look at things. it is reasonable to say that ubuntu has created the results of today, and debian is also completely achieved, but why not debian? The debian community does not pay enough attention to ease-of-use. On the contrary, if the debian community attaches great importance to ease-of-use as ubuntu does, it is not popular now, however, debian's use of LZ is not so in-depth. And you seem to have made Ubuntu and Debian too independent.

First of all, Ubuntu comes from Debian, and there is no doubt that they are bloody friends.

Second, Ubuntu and Debian are making progress together. we are very happy to see that the current Debian also has its own software center. this is what we learned from Ubuntu. at the beginning, the software center was called "Ubuntu Software Center" and later changed to "Debian software Center ".

Third, the Ubuntu and Debian repositories are not exactly the same. the compiling environment of each package is different. of course they are not completely universal. these are all normal. Is it because the RPM and RHEL of Fedora or CentOS are not completely universal, does it deny their relationship? This is obviously incorrect. Unfortunately, it cannot be better than xp's current grub version 0.98. this is irrelevant to ubuntu and debian. do not ignore the structure of linux. Besides, the software center is the effort of the development community and all the developers who use it. as long as the code and dependency package are compatible, debian and ubuntu are still common, and there are a lot of software I use rpm packages to convert them into deb packages, after upgrading some libraries, you can directly install them!