Thoughts on LS > C

About such a piece of code

[[email protected]] cd/mnt/

[[email protected]] ls

[[email protected]] touch a B

[[email protected]] ls

A b

[[email protected]] ls > C

[[email protected]] ls

A b C

[[email protected]] Cat C

A

B

C

You can see that the content of LS > c is a,b,c, instead of sending a A, b into the file C, so I think the implementation of the LS >c such a simple command, the system will first determine the correct LS command and C file is reasonable, if C does not exist, that will be Mr. C, then will execute LS, and the value of LS is fed into C at this time.

This article is from the "11827782" blog, please be sure to keep this source http://11837782.blog.51cto.com/11827782/1880211

Thoughts on LS > C