The third of the four papers I wrote during the winter vacation finally had results today.
In the morning, I called the magazine and asked me for comments. A sweet voice, mm (perhaps aunt, haha), told me that my ArticleI was reviewed as follows: I did not write very well, but it was okay (rely on, What is the comment on the review !)
Hold down your anger and ask: Are there any other comments for the review? For example, where is the problem, where needs further modification, or something?
MM replied: No, but I have some comments to ask if you are willing to publish your post in the additional publication. The charges are the same as those in the main publication.
It is necessary to explain what is an additional publication. Additional journals are used by some journals and magazines to deal with articles that are not very compliant with the requirements of the journal, but are also a pity. On the one hand, they are used to generate revenue for magazines, on the one hand, it is also a little help for the broad masses of graduate students. In addition, the articles published in the additional publication do not have the journal term and the information. It is easy for you to see whether your paper is published or added.
I simply thought about the content of the articles I threw myself into this journal. Considering that the actual level is indeed limited, this journal is also an EI source journal, it is better to publish an additional publication than to publish it to other non-streaming core journals. As a result, I happily agreed to the requirements for additional publication and asked about the follow-up matters. I was very happy to have a phone call.
PS: I asked my fellow students who previously published the same journal about this topic. During the conversation, I suddenly found that this journal is no longer an EI source journal this year. I am a real fttd.
But forget it. Now that you agree, send it. It's also an article.
After writing this essay, I will continue to read the thesis.