Some time ago to see "Professor Wu Talk about algorithmic reform", feel a lot, but I feel his efforts and ideas at most is a drop in the bucket, the ultimate goal of school education is to have a level of seedling to cultivate a level, there are differences, the society can quickly adapt to the talent.
I have written a piece of text to look at this issue in the context of the Crusade: View "Professor Wu Wenhu on the teaching reform of algorithms" 30 satires
Students learn well, would like to learn I do not see the problem of curriculum design: A liberal arts students let him stay in the software company for three years, the daily programming and self-learning new knowledge, I am afraid to become very useful people, and will not say to find a job no one wants. And our school education to this practice requires very high curriculum or continuation of thousands of years of theoretical programming teaching, this is the problem of students. Is it a question of course design? I think the root cause is that the teacher is too far away from practice. The teacher does not program, the teacher does not study the language, the teacher does not study the operating system, the teacher does not make the project, the teacher for the theory and theory the evil consequence. Foreign teachers of C + + language for language development suggestions, tireless, domestic it. Several people understand the meaning of language and can make a contribution to it.
The computer was originally a class of interest to the students, and the number of people who chose this course was a glimpse of the subject. Now what age, still talking about athletes climbing, still talking about eight queens, these mathematical logic is the thing that mathematicians should care about. There are so many hot spots in society now, what is bad about? For example, a regular function is more interesting than the eight queens. Write a program to calculate how many hosts in China, probe the network node: Such a problem will make students crazy, to teach young people is to use the "pop songs", Why must use "revolutionary songs." From elementary school to university, arithmetic, equation, geometry, differential integral, matrix combination ... Mathematics has made people crazy, and computer education has to talk about purely mathematical topics. Professor Wu has not heard of Microsoft and IBM, these companies have a lot of scientists. Computer science is on the head of multi-disciplinary, and in turn, for all walks of life service. An indisputable fact is that management technology abstraction is also computer science, so there is the mrp,erp theory. It is misguided to teach the algorithm too much in pure mathematical logic.
I suggest: Why not listen to the students ' feelings. Why not listen to the feelings of people who have worked for years, and why not listen to the voices of social feedback. Why let the professor say that, do not let students jump out of the judge.
A century-old forest, three years can be felled people. One of the key high school students, one by one, after three years of baptism, unexpectedly became the employer questioned, isn't China's education worthy of criticism? Are colleges of higher learning not worth criticizing? The teacher is not worthy of criticism.
China's demand for talent now is a hundreds of thousands of gap each year, and our institutions of higher learning are unable to do this very well, why society does not criticize this critical situation.