To score Luo Yonghao and Wang ziru (I)

1. Preface

The video was so long that I couldn't watch it all night. After 80 minutes, I wrote some comments first.

First of all, for mobile phones, I am an ordinary user, not a fan, not a professional.

For Luo, he only knows that he is a celebrity. He has many fans who have made a hammer T1. Wang freely watched his video all the time, but he was not very careful when watching the video. He was not a fan of him, and he was a good player at most.

Here, as an ordinary mobile phone user, I try to objectively comment on the first 80 minutes of the conversation between Lao Luo and Wang freely, and the next 100 minutes. I will make up the conversation tomorrow or the next day.

Let's take a look. What have they won? I am familiar with what I lost.

Http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNzYyNzAwNjky.html? F = 22785246

 

2. Lao Luo is ready to take the initiative and is good at chatting.

Wang freely suggested watching the video, watching the video where something went wrong, pause, and discuss it. In fact, this idea is quite clear, because the two were originally arguing for this half-hour video. The result was put in a few minutes, and he was interrupted by Luo and did not watch the video. What can I watch without watching the video? View his big report.

Why does Luo insist on interrupting video playback because he has a big report? Can he still use it if he looks at the video? In addition, all his big text reports are sorted in order.

Therefore, from the perspective of his ordered big report, Lao Luo needs to follow his own pace from the very beginning.

 

3. "I am mocking you !" (Serious look)

In less than ten minutes, the atmosphere immediately became tense with a phrase "I am satirizing you. Note that this sentence is not a joke. It is said by Lao Luo very seriously to Wang freely.

He satirizes Wang ziru's content: Do you think a mobile phone's fragile standard is lower than the industry's, is it unacceptable?

He demonstrated that the iPhone in 2007 and iPhone 4 in 2010 both fall below industry standards.

He asked Wang freely: How do you think the fragile standards of the iPhone in 2007 and the iPhone 4 in 2010 are both below the industry standards? Do you think these two mobile phones are unacceptable?

 

Wang freely apparently did not answer this question very positively. No one can answer this question positively.

In fact, we all know that the iPhone 1 and iPhone 4 are fragile, but their functions and user experience were not comparable to those of other mobile phones in the industry at that time. How can you compare old Luo's T1 in 2014 with the iPhone in 2007 and iPhone 4 in 2010?

The death rate of high-speed trains is much higher than that of green ones. Why do you need a high-speed train when you go out?

 

I have been arguing over yi for a long time. I only come to the conclusion that the hammer T1 is fragile and Lao Luo has reduced it by one point.

 

4. "Not professional, not knowledgeable"

This is the mistake that Luo made several mobile phone dismantling and gave Wang freely's team a comment.

For Wang ziru:

After reading many explanations from Lao Luo, I think the Wang freely team does not have the ability to analyze and disassemble hardware. Lao Luo said that he is not knowledgeable and not professional, and he is right. There are several examples: the role of the sponge in the middle of the mobile phone; metal plates are not decorative; the gap between the fuselage and the back cover graphite; the role of the small button on the back cover ...... I think this is very irresponsible for Wang freely explaining hardware design issues without enough knowledge.

In addition, you can easily mislead users by pointing to the hardware design. After reading this, the user may think: Oh, the original XX mobile phone is not qualified in hardware design and will not be bought. I think this is also the most angry reason for Lao Luo, so he gave Wang freely an evaluation of "unprofessional, not knowledgeable. Borrow a sentence from a crosstalk actor-what do you think is what you think?

Therefore, the unprofessional analysis on the hardware design of the Wang ziru team is easy to mislead, reducing Wang ziru by 2 points.

For ORACLE:

First, Wang freely disconnects and analyzes the hardware design, which must be an in-depth analysis of a specific problem, such as heat dissipation. Therefore, Luo corrected the error analysis in Wang ziru's evaluation, but he could not change the current situation. For example, Wang freely said that such a design would lead to poor heat dissipation. Lao Luo explained that the design should be like this, and you can't understand Wang freely. But the problem is that even if you design it like this, there is still a heat dissipation problem on your mobile phone. In addition to heat dissipation, there are also anti-static problems. Although WANG ziru's Hardware Design Analysis is wrong, you can't avoid the problem of T1 anti-static. So, let's explain that there is still a problem with the mobile phone. The more the phone gets, the more black it gets, and everyone knows it. I 'd like to give Luo a point.

Second, the static electricity problem occurs, wang freely took out a "secret" that was not published in the evaluation video-T1 did not meet the national defense classic standard (tested in a professional third-party laboratory, 4/5 failed ). Wang freely did not take this video, which shows that he is still very kind. If he does, you can imagine who will buy it? Here, let's add one point to Wang freely. But the most annoying thing is that Lao Luo's T1 has been sold for so long, and he does not even know this as the boss! This is simply a manifestation of dereliction of duty. Here, the score is reduced to 2 points.

Finally, Luo tends to mislead users. He said: Wang ziru said that the body and the back cover are not closely bound, which will lead to untimely heat dissipation. It is wrong because the body and the back cover will cause a little heat concentration, so this is correct. Yes, there is no problem in this section, but there is a premise that you should not forget-T1 is inherently poor in heat dissipation. Luo here tells you that their design is correct. If not, it will be hotter-it gives people the feeling that your design is okay. Is there really no problem? Not hot? Luo Guang caught "We did this to prevent getting hotter", but did not say "it is very hot now ". Here, we will deduct one point for Lao Luo.

 

5. "Are you talking ?"

After analyzing the various hardware design problems in Wang ziru's evaluation, Luo concluded that the above was a case and gave the conclusion that he was not professional or knowledgeable.

Wang freely admitted his mistake and easily said that this is a common growth and progress. This sentence makes old Luo angry-"Are you a human saying ?"

Good, Wang freely can grow and make progress. After all, this industry has just emerged and he is just young. Here, I admit that there is no direct loss to his mistakes, but it helps him grow. But Lao Luo is different. He has investments and costs to make money. Your mistake has led to the loss of many users. Although he cannot take legal responsibility, but that's not enough. Wang freely did not promptly update the problems he found during the evaluation. This is very irritating. No wonder Luo said: "Don't start installation after it has an influence ". Here, Let Wang freely lose one point.

As an Elder, Luo's attitude towards speaking is a bit inappropriate, especially in this talk program. Although there are direct commercial benefits, the public should pay attention to words and deeds in public places. Here, we will deduct one point for Lao Luo.

 

6. "T. Tt/Hei"

At this time, Luo's big report directly wrote a "black" word. Then, the "T. Tt/Hei" Pinyin is used in the given link. This is the same as Guo Degang's intention to refer to "cctv2" as "CCTV-2. No wonder everyone said that he would ask Luo to talk about crosstalk.

This is the case. When Wang freely evaluated the visual angle of T1, he said that T1 had prevented the most unfavorable position (most mobile phones were shot in this position, which would have a bad effect ). Do Luo think this was intentional? Do you think this is "black? What do you mean.

Then Luo asked Wang freely why T1 was placed at a disadvantage? Why not compete fairly with other mobile phones? Wang freely cannot answer the question... At this time, Wang freely was very embarrassed, just like a primary school student who was asked by a teacher.

Finally, he admitted the mistake, but in order to save his face, he confidently said that even if it was wrong, there was still a problem with the visual angle of T1. You may have discovered that this is similar to the above situation.

Whether it is "black" or "intentional", Wang freely has misled consumers and caused adverse effects. Here Wang ziru is reduced by 2 points.

Although Luo corrected this problem, he could not avoid the poor visual angle of T1. This time, we all know that the more black it is. Delete a point for Luo.

 

7. "Didn't you listen to me for five minutes ?"

Luo promised Wang ziru that, if he answered the question about the unfavorable position from the visual angle mentioned above, he could talk for five minutes. After Wang freely answered the question, Luo forgot what he said and repeatedly interrupted Wang freely. When Wang freely reminded me that "didn't you listen to me for five minutes?", Luo became a deaf man and never looked at Wang freely. He had been promoting his weekend activities at XX coffee house.

This kind of rogue, rogue, and disrespectful behavior, especially as an elderly person against the younger generation, is very low price. Here, we will deduct one point for Lao Luo.

 

8. "It's the best phone in the eastern hemisphere, but it's not the most ......"

The two were in a fierce debate, and they spoke in disorder:

Wang: "Aren't you the best phone in the Eastern Hemisphere ?"

Luo: "We are the best mobile phone in the eastern hemisphere, but not the most ......" (There are two people who are confused about what they are talking about later)

According to the logic of a normal person's speech, "but" or "but" deny the previous viewpoint, or describe the later viewpoint to cover the previous viewpoint. You guess what old Luo wanted to say at the time?

Here, we will deduct one point for Lao Luo.

 

9. Summary of PK scores in the first half

Old Luo:-1-1-2-1-1-1-1-1 =-9

Wang ziru:-2 + 1-1-2 =-4

In the first half, Wang freely Xiaosheng won Luo.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Request to wait for the second half ......

 

To score Luo Yonghao and Wang ziru (I)