Two rail lines

There are two tracks, one is obsolete and one is in use.

A child plays on a deactivated track, and most children play on the rails they are using.

Unfortunately, the train is coming, and you are standing in the distance of the rail switcher, you can save most children, you can save a child, what will you do?

Almost everyone will save most children, preferring to sacrifice a child. And the child made the right decision, but why did the person who made the right decision have to sacrifice for the majority?

-----------------------------------------------------

The above is the original text of the article, this is really a sad and interesting little story to think. If we are not superficial and read it in general, but think seriously about it, there may be different views.

In a big look, the story says, "Almost everyone ..." seems to fit in with people's intuition, but after careful thinking, the conclusion is debatable.

The implied premise of this article is that every child is the same, but it is clear that the sum of the energy value of man and man, the positive and negative effects of society, is hardly the same.

If Hitler and his SS were on a railroad track, Einstein was on the other track. How would you choose? It is clear that almost everyone will make the opposite choice above.

What would you choose if a railroad track was a group of cleaners and a mayor on the other track?

If a railroad track is a group of mayors and a janitor on the other track, how would you choose? What is this again?

Many people make choices intuitively because of the "majority" above, but in fact this is questionable.

If a railroad track is a group of craftsmen to repair the Great Wall, on the other track is Confucius on his old man. Obviously, if the history of the span of hundreds of years to examine the problem, the Great Wall may have to go back, Confucius, he may have passed many generations, then a railroad track on the seemingly "minority", may be a longer span of time is an absolute majority. If we look at this problem with a development perspective, there may be different conclusions.

What would you choose if you were a group of prostitutes on a railroad track and a woman who drank and contracted syphilis soon after being pregnant for nine months on the other track? Why?

If a railroad track is a group of prostitutes on a brothel, the other track is a woman who is drunk and infected with syphilis soon after nine months of pregnancy-----(except that the child who will be born is the future Beethoven). How would you choose? What is this again?

What would you choose if you were an ordinary woman on a railroad track and all the prostitutes on the other track?

If a railroad track is an ordinary woman, on the other track is full of prostitutes, but some celebrities visited the colored place one day (if you think this possibility is very small, think of Jackie, a big V bar), and unfortunately left the dragon species, mixed in the majority of this group of people, how would you choose?

If a railroad track is a group of energetic college students, on the other track is a miserable on the other side of the road is a child with a small salary is likely to be unable to maintain the life of a single mother (imagine this person will be the future boss of this group of college students, deputies, today we call Miss Dong's character), you will choose?

If a railroad track is a group of entrepreneurs, on the other track is a life in a lonely country ignorant also no achievement of ordinary people, imagine that this group of entrepreneurs is the Republic of China, under the pseudo-rule of the Northeast businessmen, those who Thurong, killing compatriots, in Daihatsu cynical, destroying the environment, poisoning Yu Shi, how would you choose?

If this goes on, there may be countless conclusions.

You asked me? I choose My side.

Two rail lines