Two functions (Software Center, UBUNTU one) that I care about after Ubuntu 9.10 is upgraded

Write by nine days Yan Ling (jtianling) -- blog.csdn.net/vagrxie

Discuss newsgroups and documents

No matter which new version of the operating system is released, it will be an "unprecedented, epoch-making" product. Without anything else, I feel that every time an advertisement is "unprecedented, epoch-making ". I don't know how many innovative things are involved in every upgrade of the operating system, or how much difference is made between ubuntu9.10 and ubuntu9.04 and ubuntu8.10, I don't know how large the span is between Windows 7, Windows Vista, and Windows XP. I just want to figure out what time should we be in if we are an epoch? Alas, you need to understand it. It's not easy to build an operating system ..... Recently, Windows 7 came out, and I didn't upgrade it. When it became popular, I could keep up with the software and try again. ubuntu9.10 also came out. I upgraded it. After all, I clicked a few mouse clicks to upgrade it, obviously it will not become popular, so I do not have to wait for it to become popular -_-!

I am actually using KDE. Here we should be talking about kubuntu. The graphic interface is much simpler. There are prompts automatically popped up and silly operations. What should I do if I only have a command line on my desktop? You can find a solution on the Internet to install the update-Manager-core package,

Sudo apt-Get Install update-Manager-core

Then run:

Sudo do-release-upgrade-d

.

Changes in ubuntu9.10 and ubuntu9.04:

Introducing the new feature of ubunt9.10 officially

For Chinese, refer to this article:

Ubuntu9.10 will be the top ten reasons for game rule changes

There are several points that attract me:

1: Software Center

I feel like a new product is truly an epoch-making product. As long as you don't want the latest version, the software installation in Ubuntu will be simpler than that in windows, for Windows, choose download> install. For Ubuntu, select the application. Because of the open-source/free nature, UBUNTU can make some breakthroughs. We can't learn anything about thunder and 360 in Windows (not to mention the problem that requires manual next installation ), I have mentioned this before and I feel that Ubuntu is the most user-friendly. In the command line, I can only use apt, but only use apt, and the installation of software is extremely comfortable, in addition (Personal package Archives: UBUNTU), which makes the Deb package sources in Ubuntu richer. Basically, I have never met any of them. Since the Software Center should replace the original software tools for adding/deleting software, should the new and kpackagekit be integrated (far from being easy to use? That will solve the problem that GTK + is not installed and cannot be used. (In fact, the only benefit of not having to make a new one is that I don't often feel dizzy because my software is too rich. I spend a lot of time downloading a bunch of software that looks interesting but actually doesn't actually work for me ), it is said that the software center will be added to commercial software -_-! That's even more exciting. Let's take a look. The price accepted as a KDE user is to install a bunch of gnome stuff -_-! I did not yield to the new one, but to the Software Center ...............

The following figure shows how I chose to install kdbg.

It seems that the software interface has been re-designed, and the classification of software is more oriented to common users (non-programmers). Now the application for installing software is classified, which can be seen from the above, the classification is basically the same as the menu startup classification. In the past, it was classified by software implementation, such as gnome, Kde, and python. In this way, it should be easier for common users to use it. However, if I look for something, I really don't know which category it actually belongs .... Well, sometimes I guess I have to make a new one. In addition, because both software are based on apt, it cannot run simultaneously.

In addition, in the other category, I did not see real commercial software. I only saw flash Pugin, atidriver, and other things (maybe the so-called commercial software). Of course, they are not open-source, but they are free of charge. I thought Oracle's Linux version was provided for download -_-! (Think too far) or commercial software refers to MP3 decoder and other things? (Indeed not accepted by the real GNU open-source guard)

Basically, the software center didn't surprise me very much. It may be more convenient for common users. Instead, it seems difficult for me to find the packages and install them in batches, deleting is not as convenient as before.

 

 

2.Ubuntu one

It's really good to synchronize files and 2 GB of space. Although I already have a Netease network USB flash drive, I don't have to worry about using it. It's the design that guides customers to perform more operations on their web pages, there are no other access methods provided, and there is always little space. Besides, it is a tool built in the operating system with the synchronization function. This is very attractive to me. Now, I don't want to discuss any better questions about putting things on the Internet or on my computer. If you can, I want to put all the operating systems online (as if there was something similar in the past ).

Obviously, you have to register and provide two versions, which is one of the ways to generate canonical. ^ I have already registered with launchpad.net, now you can directly use your account, not only file sharing, but also note, contact, and other functions. The most depressing thing is ..... After tortoisehg, this function is bound with Nautilus. I once again vomit blood and lament that I am using KDE abandoned children -_-! However, after Ubuntu one is used, a directory named Ubuntu one will be added to the main folder. At this time, you only need to copy the file and the file will be automatically synchronized :), haha, it is quite easy to use. In this way, I will use this folder as a working directory in the future. No matter where it is, I am not afraid of file loss, 2 GB space can be used for a long time, and can be conveniently synchronized on my server (you also need to study how to use it on the command line)

Webpage usage page:

 

The most unfortunate feature is quickly, which is a good one. (It Sounds Like) the result is for GTK -_-! I'm not happy. Abandoned children .. Alas .... And rhythmbox ...... We are not unusable. The price is to install gnome-_-In KDE -_-! (I have installed... for the software center ....) Haha, but many QT tools are enough and I don't think too much about it.

 

Sina also published the official release of ubuntu 9.10, which was downloaded. It was found that Sina had already downloaded some popular Linux distributions, in addition, Netease provided some sources for Linux releases (I have never used them, but I only heard of them). Now Linux is developing well.

 

I wanted to write something complete, and finally I went to the software download experience ....... Sorry, sorry

 

 

 

The author of the original article retains the copyright reprinted. Please indicate the original author and give a link

Write by nine days Yan Ling (jtianling) -- blog.csdn.net/vagrxie