Two wars brought by component software production

The rise of component-based software production is accompanied by two wars. One of the wars is: the War of the component production mode and the code mode of production, the mode of production of the war component, by virtue of its efficiency superiority, does not fight and wins. Another kind of war may be: the war between the infrastructure platform (middleware platform) and the Application Infrastructure platform (business base platform), the war is not clear, the suspense is heavy. Component-based software production adopts the way of assembling, which greatly improves the production efficiency of enterprise-class application software, so it will subvert the current software production mode. At present, software is software; later we will say: Software is the assembly of components. Today we save the machine in Zhongguancun, tomorrow we will find that many people are saving software. Revolutionary changes are in it. One day, we found that the formation, assembly, became the "jargon" and the mainstream of software production. This war, the victory and defeat at the beginning of the decision; Component-based software production methods will undoubtedly win. component-based software production brings about the change of the software industry, it will produce its own ecological chain: 1. Component production tool provider, providing development tools; 2. Using development tools to open commercial components, provide component or component library; 3. Assemble the software using the components developed by others and the components that are developed by you; 4. Use software developed by others for implementation and two development. The manufacturers of the ecological chain depend on each other in order to exert maximum network value. Of course, some vendors may span several levels. than to say that China's famous software company Shanghai Universal provides the EOS system, including development tools and development environment, management and maintenance tools and support platform, but also provide commercial components and component library, the General component library has more than 2000 components, in this domestic and foreign are considerable, this is an important knowledge, experience and wealth. The focus of the second war is actually a problem: the need for an application based platform (business base platform) is not required. In other words, today's middleware can not complete the role of the application infrastructure platform, if not, then the development of middleware can not expand and have these functions? If the answer is no, it is possible to add a layer to the ecological chain: 5. Application platform provider, providing a platform for applications. Then, today's network resource level (network database, network operating system, middleware) provider, will be in the enterprise application of the market encountered the "ceiling"-the application of the platform to block. They will find interlacing as Foster, this level requires new software providers to occupy, or network resource level providers in the development of a new platform different from middleware. If the answer is yes. Then there will be war on the platform floor: one side of the war: the existing middleware and application Server provider to consolidate the capabilities. The other side of the war is the existing management software and application infrastructure providers to infiltrate their platforms. They have different perspectives, one from the bottom up, the network and the technology, and the other from the top down, the perspective of application and business. Each other advantage is not the same, one is good at network resource management;Another good at business e-. The winner of the war belongs to the manufacturer who can look at the problem from his opponent's point of view, learn from his opponents, and turn his opponent's advantage into his advantage.