Use the win Server 2012 storage Pool

Because Veeam backs up a few tib things, and Veeam's best platform is 2012, try 2012 storage pools

I have a couple of options.

Plan one, a physical machine 3650, 2 disk RAID1 do system disk, 5 disk RAID0 Do data disk, and then storage pool configuration can see 5 disk, 4 block automatic, 1 block hot standby ...

Scenario two, a physical machine 3650, 2 disk RAID1 do system disk, 5 disk RAID5 Do data disk, and then storage pool configuration can see 1 disk, 1 block automatic ...

The above is a physical machine solution, the individual feel that physical raid faster than soft raid, but also reliable, but the expansion of the pool may be troublesome, of course, I think it is a cliché, only after testing, or Microsoft know the best answer

Another problem, a few disks in the storage pool, can achieve the best reading and writing ability. (can also extend the SSD, data compression and other functions when stored),

There is another way, will not be 6 disk to do pool, every three bit a RAID5, so that the pool has 2 logic disk ... Like, so fast ...

Scenario three, HDD 10TiB virtual machine ... Just a disk, then a certain GPT partition, activating a little trouble,

Scheme four, 100GiB do system disk, mount a 10TiB GPT disk, so good activation, disk can also be mounted everywhere,

Scheme Five, 100GiB to do system disk, the remaining 5 1TiB disk to do pool, can be fully automatic without hot standby, because there is storage is hot ready, easy ... And the virtual machine generally does not run the storage pool, because in the software nesting three times, may affect the hard disk read and write performance, moreover, the virtual machine's hard disk, originally can be arbitrarily hot expansion, does not need the physical machine like the pool, but can use it to do a test.

As shown in the following:

5 x 1TiB, do pool ... Not enough to add, more can be deleted ... This is useful for physical machines, virtual machine mounts a disk can be arbitrarily extended ...

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M01/59/0F/wKioL1TGPnzRvPFdAAiFIIdYmSI803.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 1.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpnzrvpfdaaifiidymsi803.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M01/59/12/wKiom1TGPZ_jpjRrAAgO1gMT070727.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 2.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpz_jpjrraago1gmt070727.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M02/59/0F/wKioL1TGPnzxJaPUAAf69w3GMIU100.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 3.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpnzxjapuaaf69w3gmiu100.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M02/59/12/wKiom1TGPZ_BzzQ3AAeTpSHtAWQ760.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 4.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpz_bzzq3aaetpshtawq760.jpg "/>

If the physical machine is RAID0, here's a hot spare. If the physical machine did the other hardware RAID here should be automatic (, 5 disk RAID5 performance good), I am a virtual machine, so do not need hot standby ...

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/0F/wKioL1TGPn3BYchEAAjjHgT6XUs455.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 5.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpn3bycheaajjhgt6xus455.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/0F/wKioL1TGPn6hUYDxAAfPe8ks21g706.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 6.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpn6huydxaafpe8ks21g706.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/12/wKiom1TGPaHRXhQgAAdsmbWdK4M203.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 8.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpahrxhqgaadsmbwdk4m203.jpg "/>

New Virtual Disk ...

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M01/59/0F/wKioL1TGPn-S1NxSAAhm_GbLzns328.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 9.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpn-s1nxsaahm_gblzns328.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M01/59/12/wKiom1TGPaKTJrksAAg6GXTgWOk623.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 10.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpaktjrksaag6gxtgwok623.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M02/59/0F/wKioL1TGPoDxaMsBAAgNbBQ76EI591.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 11.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpodxamsbaagnbbq76ei591.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M02/59/12/wKiom1TGPaPiYYJeAAhivuLIGV4440.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 12.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpapiyyjeaahivuligv4440.jpg "/>

Here is a special note:

Simple to get the best performance ... But will not affect the reliability, if the physical machine is 5 disk to do a RAID5, for the pool on a logical disk, then simple very good, if it is the other way you have to look at ...

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/0F/wKioL1TGPoHy-C-xAAhJLEoaOo4669.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 13.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpohy-c-xaahjleoaoo4669.jpg "/>

If it's a normal application, it's fine.

If the database is read and written in real time, fixed, once enough to get the best performance

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/12/wKiom1TGPaSgzy0bAAgBHnNrIas140.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 14.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpasgzy0baagbhnnrias140.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M01/59/0F/wKioL1TGPoGwMgASAAfoCCFNbZU504.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 15.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpogwmgasaafoccfnbzu504.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M01/59/12/wKiom1TGPaWjYhGHAAhutYj6z6c670.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 16.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpawjyhghaahutyj6z6c670.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M02/59/0F/wKioL1TGPoKysq9tAAha8F1Ha5I644.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 17.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpokysq9taaha8f1ha5i644.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/12/wKiom1TGPaWTimlGAAkbopIlRTg203.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 18.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpawtimlgaakbopilrtg203.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M02/59/12/wKiom1TGPaaibs04AAlZl2R1HUM245.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 20.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpaaibs04aalzl2r1hum245.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M01/59/0F/wKioL1TGPoTiKbUvAAlo73vEc7E506.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 21.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgpotikbuvaalo73vec7e506.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/0F/wKioL1TGPoSiCsi6AAjCO6V7bgc507.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 22.png "alt=" Wkiol1tgposicsi6aajco6v7bgc507.jpg "/>

650) this.width=650; "src=" http://s3.51cto.com/wyfs02/M00/59/12/wKiom1TGPaez-ImwAAaEYB65icg817.jpg "style=" float: none; "title=" 23.png "alt=" Wkiom1tgpaez-imwaaaeyb65icg817.jpg "/>

There is no point, please give me more advice ...

This article is from the "Ksitigarbha" blog, make sure to keep this source http://ksitigarbha.blog.51cto.com/1013724/1608580

Use the win Server 2012 storage Pool