Using logic to refute Fang zhouzi 2: 12 methods for proving that Han has no replacement pen (1-2)
1. assume that a person who writes an article for Han is not famous for himself, then this person must be mentally handicapped. However, if this person's article is well written, then this person is definitely not mentally handicapped, therefore, there are logical contradictions. Therefore, it is not true that some people substitute for Han.
Some people have refuted that Han Ren may be writing on behalf of others, but in fact, "Han Ren is honest, cute, and his writing is very simple and smooth, not as old as Han's sixteen years old, in fact. Han Ren did not have a junior high school or a high school when he was studying, and he did not know English at all. He experienced the Cultural Revolution, the traps can imagine that Han Ren helped Han write a new campus long "Three secrets" about junior and senior high school life. "First, Han Ren is honest. How can a real person do fraud? Han Ren has never been in junior high school or English. He has never had these experiences. How can he write a long campus for junior high school? How absurd this is. Therefore, Han Ren is not valid.
2. the content of literature is gibberish. From the perspective of the content of literature, it cannot be determined who wrote the article. Therefore, even if there is a substitute, it cannot be proved logically, therefore, there will never be a substitute logically. Some people always look for evidence from Han's works. Do these people understand literature? Do you know that literature is what you think? You may not understand the imagination of others, but you cannot deny the imagination of others. Some people create literature by dreaming, and they will not remember it after waking up, this is abnormal. Of course, Han Ren does not rely on dreaming to create literature, nor does he use unreliable imagination to create literature. He has limitations on his experience, but there is no denying how Han created literature.