The recent "Commission door" spread on the Internet by Ufida, which can largely explain the value of the software.
I. Software is good, but it is easy to leave evidence for others.
Yonyou Zhiyuan's "Commission door" information comes from its own OA system, indicating that the software can well write down the process and easily become "evidence ".
Does UFIDA's "Commission door" come from executives, or is it from "UFIDA's own insecurity" that is easily cracked by common employees to obtain confidential information? I think the latter is highly likely because I am passing through the Domino OA of a foreign-funded enterprise and can obtain various forms of the company without special permissions. Whether or not the security of a system is in China is difficult for an organization to give authoritative answers.
Therefore, it is recommended that the software architect check whether the software security of the architecture is poor and cannot withstand hacker attacks.
I often see what websites are hacked. I really don't understand how hackers are doing so well, or whether the website security budget is hacked?
2. Sales staff and software engineers
It is often seen that software engineers do not accept sales staff's higher income than they do. They talk about big things. After seeing "Commission", you can know that the value of software mainly comes from "sales ". A software can be 10 thousand yuan or 0.3 million yuan, and the price is the result of the sales staff's efforts. The value of programmers is negligible.
Of course, if there is no software for the customer, it is "fraud". Therefore, the value of software programmers is to develop practical software, and the best interface will be a bright spot.
The grass-roots users of software rely on their software to work and live. They don't have a back-to-point. So you need to understand them. If you want back-to-point services, you should work harder, as Mr. Ji said, to help the company sell services.
Iii. Special Application Software Value
Applications such as Office Word are universal, while OA, HR, and ERP are more personalized and classified as specialized software.
The value of specialized application software, of course, for software companies, is the higher the sales, the better. If it is a benign competition, the value can be split into the value of the software, rather than being distorted.
The customer needs to be met. What if this satisfies the demand? I think, the most basic one is that the opinions of the grass-roots employees who use the software are actually too small. Besides, they have no choice but to use the software, big deal choose another company to work. Therefore, whether or not to meet the requirements mainly comes from the feeling of a middle-level manager, which does not have quantitative indicators.
The rational return of software value can promote software companies to make software more powerful and high-tech technical features (selling software to enterprises in the United States and Japan is the most important factor in evaluation ).
At present, most domestic software companies are mainly engaged in sales and development. Of course, there is nothing wrong with it. In fact, commercial software is called only the software that can be sold out. Just like the self-developed "time-and-Attendance salary can achieve the dot C5 software without manual work to predict the result", it cannot be sold out, and it is naturally not good software.
I hope that the "Commission Gate" event will allow software engineers to think more and further recognize the value of "dedicated Application Software", although most of the value of the software is created by the sales staff; however, we earnestly serve grassroots users so that we can continuously develop better software. In this way, we can quickly welcome the era of no rebates or sales staff, so that users can freely choose software.
2010.03.04 update
An inevitable response with special characteristics. hackers and hackers have to carry your back this time. Chinese hackers are amazing.
Picture from: http://tech.sina.com.cn/it/2010-03-04/22433904257.shtml