Views on each team project

1. Banking Cat

(1) The interface needs to be beautified, especially in the background of the font;

(2) Show the consumption time feeling good;

(3) The contrast of the screen is not obvious enough to play a cautionary role, you can consider adding some color font display income and expenditure, so more obvious.

2. What to Run

(1) interface design is All black, it is best to make some changes;

(2) The specific function realizes less, hoped can add some functions.

3. Water Knight

(1) The registration option can be added more;

(2) Only the landing interface, may be other functions have done but did not show it;

4. Iron Big Cloud Disk

(1) The interface is simple, but not beautiful enough;

(2) Registration best can be added to the audit, you can join the school number and college professional binding

(3) It is better to add the limit of upload and download;

(4) The file arrangement method needs to be optimized.

5. Weather Tips

(1) interface jump mode can be improved;

(2) Hope can realize the input city to find weather, can achieve real-time weather;

(3) To achieve the switch city and select the city (Weather interface, City interface), but compared with the market software is not much different, you can add some features of things.

6.YOUI Chat Communication Tool

(1) The interface is more concise;

(2) Only the diary function can be run on the phone, but chat can only be implemented on the virtual machine.

(3) Text can only be transmitted, but voice, picture can not be transmitted.

7. Campus Trading Assistant

(1) can login, but do not display the interface after landing, no jump;

(2) User interface is too simple, and not too beautiful;

(3) You can upload images, but you cannot view the uploaded images.

8. Get in the car.

(1) At the beginning of the interface should have a registration function;

(2) Some typos in individual locations;

(3) The slide bar is doing well, but there are few functions.

9. Wonderful fate

(1) to connect with the server, but there are some problems with the link;

(2) There is no registration problem, the specific reason is unknown;

(3) There is a problem with the data on the cloud server.

10. Iron Student Hui

(1) The contents of the inquiry are somewhat thin;

(2) The content can not generate a form;

(3) Only realized the function, the interface has not been optimized.

11. Class School

(1) Whether the interaction between the virtual machine and the mobile phone can be extended to the whole school;

(2) Each time the teacher needs to input the contents of the job;

(3) operation is too cumbersome, after all, not every mobile phone has 3d-touch function.

12. Library Assistants

(1) Beautiful interface, pleasing to the eye;

(2) Borrowing function is not completed, can not download pictures from the server;

(3) Can sweep the code to check the book, can put the cover of the book on the interface to let the reader have intuitive feeling.

13. Small Angry Youth

(1) Brush face function is not realized;

(2) The interface needs to be optimized.

14. Sleeping Monkeys

(1) The interface is lovely, easy to be welcomed by a particular crowd;

(2) The function realizes very well, basically does not have the flaw, achieves the anticipated goal.

15. It's all potatoes.

(1) The interface is concise and clear;

(2) Functional realization also basically achieved the desired goal, no big problem.

16. Daily study

(1) Only the basic teaching building and the first teaching building;

(2) Only study room inquiry function;

(3) The query function is too complex.

17. Duo to Microphone

(1) The existence of the server makes login registration become convenient;

(2) The menu bar at the bottom makes switching easy.

18. Lollipop

(1) General interface

(2) server configuration is successful;

(3) The Android server failed to submit a request to the server.

19. Where have all the money gone?

And the advice of the management cat is basically the same, do not repeat.

20. Some people

(1) The stage objectives have not been achieved;

(2) The module design of the performance point calculation is poor.

Views on each team project