Web page revision is a difficult one to read

Every family has its own difficult to read, and the revision becomes one of the difficult to read by each IT company. The difficulty of the revision in this Nanjing UCD book meeting in the party through your good friends in the conversation to behave so straightforward. The larger the company, the more inclined to technology, the more difficult the revision. One of the Chinese manufacturing Network and Fainchy is the most obvious trend of technology.

The revision is the hard to read

On the revision of the point of view from Li Fanxi began, Brother Fainchy's speech on the point that the revision is facing difficulties, this difficulty is usually not technical difficulty, nor design difficulties. Here involved in the enterprise high-level objections, the company's top concern is that after the revision is very likely to lose the original customers, or due to the late revision of the cost is too high directly lead to the top executives would rather not change the new clothes. Then Wang Sister's point of view seems to prove that this, the difference is the company's senior executives also hope to be able to complete a reinvent. But in such a company, the revision is not a department, the other departments are willing to go through this process is the eldest sister to face the biggest problem. In the face of large enterprises, the revision is definitely not a person said it can play a role. It is necessary for the Grand of the whole enterprise to cooperate and fight together. and need to accurately calculate the cost, risk, time and many other factors.

Back Tri Wenjun from a technical point of view to promote the difficulties of the revision. In 文俊 's view, the most acceptable limit of the revision is only the revision of the frame. Change the content, change the function, these are no problem, if bones such a big thing is best not to do. 文俊 is a software engineer, and his point of view is obviously the same as that of most technicians. And some executives, if they are technically born, often disagree with the revision. Of course this refers to the revision is a complete revision.

Before the revision of the battle is not coming, please drill.

The third speaker is Yun Han, Windham's professional and we are a little farther away, as if to do radio, communications such. is still in southeast University. Yun Han has a hobby is to see the train, this is a very strange hobby. So Windham's speech is from the Nanjing Subway ticketing system. He asked, what is the wrong place for the ticket machine of Nanjing subway? He said that many people will subconsciously first coin, and then to select the site and the number of votes. Then it would waste a lot of time, and the result would be the front row of the ticket machine. The result of long queues is to make the subway station crowded. Then this is facing the problem of how to change, because you even if you change will also be said not good, not accustomed to. The original process for some people who often take the subway has become familiar with. Although not very good, but at least the old users have accepted. Of course, accept does not indicate that it must be efficient, change is certain to change. So not too blind, you can identify the process in advance, establish models, conduct process testing. In the original process to find some people who have never been used to test, recorded their order of operation, recorded the time spent, and then successively recorded the second time, as well as multiple operations results. Then take the new model out and do the same test, which will inevitably result in a relatively accurate report. Naturally, it is clear whether to change or not to change. I very much appreciate the statement made by Windham because he is the only one who speaks directly to the solution. The revision is like a predictable battle, prior to knowing that a sand table exercise will surely allow him to have a grasp of whether the battle can be overcome.

The revision is the inevitable road

Some people oppose the revision of natural people to encourage the revision, the meeting Xiao Weixiong said he is a very advocate of the revision of the people. In Wei-hung's view, revision is the key to solving the problem. If the sewing always play a decisive role. The revision will also attract more new users when they may lose some of their old users. So not to worry about losing some of the users and then give up the revision.

Also support the revision of the Yuan Liang (green pepper potato wire), his position is very special, change and do not change can be his own master, his boss gave him a lot of space, but the confusion is the final decision to use the right is still in the hands of customers. Yuan Liang is a very motivated young man, in a place where he could have been, no one has arranged for him to make some changes, and he can automatically do the revision and do his best to improve the quality of the enterprise's products with his own knowledge. Of course, he also said, he is very unhappy is that every time his hard to change the content of the end is not a customer identity. This is not because he changed badly, but more because Yuan Liang had no opportunity to communicate directly with the client, so that his work could not be affirmed.

In addition to standing on the user's point of view, the bad things should be changed, which can be said to sit on my side of the Zhang Yi point of view. She said her a user experience process, she went to the Nanjing Library to borrow books, repeatedly found that the South map of the query system is very inconvenient, it is difficult to find the book to meet their own requirements, of course, the premise is that the south of the picture is the book. And their renewal process is extremely inconvenient, resulting in her and many readers have not been able to renew in time and was fined. She thinks that as China's third, Asia's fourth-largest library, these details should be able to keep pace.

The revision is not only the destruction, but also the new life

I thought it was the most interesting speech of all the people sitting at that time Chen Lei. He is an operation manager, he is standing in a non technical and not design point of view of the problem. He did not directly put forward his views, only to introduce their company is how the revision. Every revision of their company is in fact constantly enriching the process. Whether he will lose the customer he did not speak, but he is very proud of the future of the rich content of the revision. I think this is also our revision when we need to think about the problem. We need not only to change, but also to increase. The revision is not only the destruction of some of the original things, but also for our products, Web sites to provide more fresh blood, and thus bring a new life.

Change will be better

In fact, I was also more cautious about the revision, Tan Yi blog and Yuzheng whether the two blogs to change I have met the voice of opposition. Some people say that once changed, it may lose the original in the hearts of the kind of reading. For this I can only change a little bit in some detail. But I think it will be changed, but I may use a multi-step revision, that is, it will not be changed too much in the beginning. In most people are also able to identify the premise of the first phase of the changes, when we are accustomed to the first phase of the revision after the gradual revision to make the process of revision to hide. Release a large earthquake into several small earthquakes. Of course, this is only my own personal website revision plan. For the revision of large companies, there are many factors involved, the need to do more. will also face more pressure. Because I have not been to a large company so I feel that I can not understand their difficulties, and can not provide my advice. But one thing is clear: "Change must be done."

These are the statements I heard in the party to do a summary of the statement, which may be biased with the views of the parties, if there is too far from the place to want to meet friends. And very sorry is Xinmin's speech I can't think of now. May be because the voice of xinmin at that time is relatively small, another day I and Xinmin Exchange again ask him again to the main idea of the other talk again.