When Silverlight exceeded flash, it is the time when Silverlight died.

Q: Which company wants to make the browser bigger and stronger?

A: Google, Mozilla, and Adobe, but in short, Microsoft is not.

 

Q: Why?

A: Simply put, if the browser is too powerful, it is not in Microsoft's strategic interests.

 

In fact, you can understand this truth. If everything can be done in the browser, do users still care about the following operating systems? If someone else develops a browser-based, easy-to-use, inexpensive office without installation and maintenance, is MS Office still selling?

 

So I have never been optimistic about the Silverlight technology. It is not that Microsoft does not have the strength to do it well, but that the commercial nature of Microsoft determines that he does not really want to perfect it so well that it threatens itself.

So I have a suggestion for those who are still focusing on Silverlight: Be careful. Microsoft's current posture seems to be pushing Silverlight vigorously, because there are already too many latencies in flash in this field. However, Microsoft will never devote itself to this field for the reasons described above.

Google, Mozilla, and Adobe are the only competitors who are eager to make the web the best, because this is the only way to survive and they have no choice. Unlike Microsoft, there is no Silverlight, ASP. NET, no ASP. NET, and smart client, so Microsoft is hard to achieve. If Silverlight fails, Microsoft will not lose anything. It does not care, because it has many client technologies. The real loss will be the poor developers who put their lives on Silverlight.

Although the war was not started for a long time, the end of the war was unknown.

 

What if one day, Silverlight exceeded flash?

Then Microsoft will put it on the shelf and never develop it again.

That's right, just like Microsoft's victory over Netscape many years ago and never updating ie again.

When Silverlight exceeded flash, it is the time when Silverlight died.