KARI was fired for the first major news in the industry during the Spring Festival. In my opinion, this is a bad thing and a good thing. It is a good thing, because early speculation is better than late speculation. The bad thing is that Kali did not build anything in five years, but it has destroyed a lot: HP's traditional culture, HP's traditional competitiveness, and HP's innovation capabilities, there are also HP's historical contacts and images. Today, HP is not so much a high-tech company as a high-tech monster. In addition to making HP more bloated and more diversified, Kali did not build a unique competitiveness for HP's future. Kali resigned (in fact, it was evicted), which seemed to have been expected for a long time. I don't know why, and I have always been not optimistic about caili's leadership of HP. It seems that she and HP are completely two types of people, and they seem to be two incompatible people. The outcome is inevitable: HP is a female male and Kelly is a male female; an idyllic enterprise and a politician better at power. After all, this is not a marriage, but a combat fusion. In the past few years, CARI's victory was not the victory of high-tech entrepreneurs, but the victory of political means. However, after all, as CEO after six years, Kelly is not easy to play with today. We don't have to blame her much. However, we still need to think about the future of Hp, the birthplace of Silicon Valley? Today, the competition is getting more and more suffocated, relying on printers to support the Modern it dinosaur-Hewlett-Packard, how to face a worse competitive environment? This problem is absolutely not easy, and it is absolutely impossible not to be full of cruelty and danger. Of course, crisis is also an opportunity. However, more pain points can only be digested by HP alone, and Kelly's career (including political career) must be still spacious. HP is the source of the myth of Silicon Valley and a symbol of innovative technology and enterprise culture. However, as Silicon Valley becomes a holy place for global innovation, HP's pace of innovation has stopped for many years. Although HP is still the largest enterprise (revenue) in Silicon Valley, it has lost its leadership position in any important field (although it is not a product with a good market share ). Today, IBM is still dominant in terms of service and mainframe, while Microsoft and Intel are still dominant in operating systems and CPUs, cisco's strong gross margin of up to 70% shows that the dominant position of network equipment is still strong, while Dell, with its direct selling model, has never seen any signs of slowdown, however, it is a small but profiteering printer cartridge that supports HP's huge body. This is a great irony. But how long will all this be supported (the printer's maximum profit is 3-5 years )? HP is now full of ups and downs, and HP's future is full of suspense. CARI, a political "bloody" power war, broke the counterattack of the HP elders and completely split the tradition of "HP's path, it is a huge question mark whether or not the traditional decision can truly save HP and achieve it. As one of the first it giants to enter China, Hewlett-Packard has been running smoothly in China. Of course, such a wonderful day is also full of danger. Focus on HP is to focus on our it itself. As Kari leaves, HP's transformation is about to begin: losing weight is inevitable, and the Compaq business of the merger has to be revealed; splitting is one of the few choices. How to ensure the development of Hp in the next five, 10, and 20 years will be the top priority of change. |