Whether the process is important or the result is more important is a pseudo proposition.

There's a feeling when you haven't started writing this. That is, this article must be like chicken soup! However, this is just not written out of the time a feeling, as to write what, write to know ~

PS: The next article of this article has already thought well, still is the same series of thinking. This kind of thinking has been in the mind lately and has guided me to make a lot of decisions.

As a person who has received nearly 20 years of education, we have more or less heard and participated in some of the more important discussions about the process and the outcome. Although most of these discussions have no result, each of us, when we do things, will use one of them as our principle to influence our daily choices. For example: A lot of students in the library before the examination of the main points of the classmate, trying to get a diploma students, for an offer of the gains and losses happy sad for a long time classmate, of course, and exhausted all means to want to get a beautiful girl classmate. They all silently choose the result is more important. There are also many people who silently choose the process more important, such as: do not ask the result of the donor, ignoring the release of the city of the Sparrow survival problem released.

Whichever choice you take as a matter of thinking, you will find some unsatisfactory places. Do everything possible to get the diploma is not better than the other people's graduation, nor bring an exceptionally wonderful job, lost an offer did not affect their own offer to his own hands; to get a beautiful girl did not affect the future quarrel; donations may also be self-enriching. Everything is not the same as originally thought, can get out of poverty education, can change the happiness of marriage without exception and the beginning look different. It is also the same with the Prince and Princess happy together at the end of weaving a fairy tale.

The process and the result are no different, it is the process of time. --Wow

I have been looking forward to a good job by exercising my skills through the experience of the student organization. It was not until the first year that he found that his abilities had not changed, but that the change was only a title and a duty. This allowed me to let go of this expectation, knowing that the effort to work in an organization was only recognized by the student's work, and that recognition and a social worker were two things.

I had hoped to obtain a good result through the college entrance examination, according to the family said, last good university, find a good job, beg a good wife. But by the time of the examination, it has been found that the score is one thing, but what is a good university? Moreover, after the university, the college entrance examination result no longer has the significance. This is the way of our countless candidates, struggling for 12 years, to get the results of the college entrance examination so important. That's completely useless. Whether it's important to emphasize how much knowledge we've learned (forget about it), or how important it is to emphasize how many points we get (past), it's useless. What is useful is that we are arguing about the importance of knowledge or the importance of the entrance examination score on the way to choose and embark on this high school to college.

on the road, the process and the result are the same as the past. --Wow

Analysis of the past is easy to feel the consistency of the process and results, but the analysis of the future is always not so clear. Always make people feel more confused. Think of high school when and classmates pull Duzi when always willing to say two words "then?" "What's that going to do?" "It's a good way to analyze it," he added. But for now I may be in the back to add a sentence "really can?" What do you do? "These ideas can make us think more clearly when we make our decisions, and not when things evolve long after we make a decision.

The reason for thinking about this is that at the beginning of 14, when I decided to take the postgraduate examination, but also to find enough reasons for themselves and a wealth of ideological support, to strengthen their own ideas. Later, learning younger brother study sister I should go to graduate school when I just put those ideas written out. That was the first time I began to think about this problem. At that time I looked at the postgraduate entrance examination as a door, and after this, I had the energy to learn what I wanted to learn in a relatively short time. I began to realize that this view was different from the idea of tying the postgraduate entrance examination to graduate school life (the attitude that I felt that I had a good job when I was admitted to the institute).

Later on, the final exam, classroom teaching, knowledge learning three concepts of the division. Find out that these three concepts are not the same thing! Teaching is the aid of knowledge learning, the final exam is a test of teaching or knowledge learning (here one or lead to the examination of the teacher's attitude, the ambiguity of the attitude of students, this ambiguity and let many students misunderstand what is called learning). After that, let's look at some of the problems that have plagued many years:

1. Review may not be able to, why should I review?

   A: Review is a review of knowledge, knowledge of the review to consolidate the learning of knowledge. Examination is only a measure, review and examination are biased, inevitably like the wide road two cars, not to say who on the right track. Just didn't get√ to that point. Conversely, review if only to get√ to that collision point, then and fortune-telling difference is not big. The skills that are mastered are not the course skills, but the skills of guessing directions.

2. Learning what the teacher said is not necessarily used to get, why should I learn?

   A: What the teacher said is not necessarily useful, useless completely can not learn. But you have to make sure that what he says is useless. However, it is not necessary to argue that what he is talking about is to consume time and energy, and that it requires all kinds of knowledge and practical evidence to prove that he is really useless. And this process, is precisely the process of your study. If there is no such process, complaining is only a complaint.

3. The knowledge in class is behind, why should learn?

   A: See previous article. In addition, it may be a good result to be aware of and share what you are aware of to a person or teacher who is studying together.

4. Why the undergraduate work is not easy to find, and then go to study, research work is not good?

   A: Undergraduate, is only a degree. It does not involve attitude, does not fully relate to ability, and does not completely involve knowledge level. What do you look for when you recruit? Useless or useful? From a profit point of view, the company definitely needs people who can bring profits to the company. So whether to care about their education, or other, self-evident

Having figured out these questions, there was a bad result, and that was that I found that I didn't really want to do the final review. Because the review time I still in appreciate read my oneself contact of those knowledge to see where, I want to do the small thing still how much worse. Then simply put down to "review" those things, decided before the exam with my time to finish those content, they are not worth wasting my too long time.

Then I realized that the difference was a matter of goal, reality, choice, etc, so there was a discussion about the process and the result.

I was actually the first to write this part, think of it as the text, and later found that the structure is too loose too unintelligible, rather than put to the end. If I had the privilege of saying the ideas I wanted to elaborate, maybe I could have a place for this unclear text.

The process is important or the result is more important is a pseudo-proposition