Who is the responsibility of "nuclear high-key" to cultivate "foreign species" (COM?

In June 27, 2011, the Science and Technology daily published an article titled "Internet-based Chinese Simplified platform" Core-High-foundation ". This article says: "We have learned from Kingsoft, the development and production of the "Web-based Chinese Simplified public service platform" undertaken by Kingsoft's public component, I have received a letter of reply from the "Core High-key"-based component product technology's major technical issues, as well as a letter of reply from the relevant financial resources. "The Article also said: In recent years, the basis for the rapid development of WPS, with the support of the" 863 "plan, has used three years to repeat all source WPS generations, completed the most important attention type in the history of WPS."

We need to ask: what is the basis for the approval letter for the critical issues of nuclear high-key products and technologies, as well as the letter issued by the financial team? In short, what is the basis for the "submit a letter of approval and reply to the subject matter? This is the beginning of "nuclear high-key" Nurturing "foreign species" (COM.

A large number of facts have proved: the topic "development and commercialization of the Web-based Chinese Simplified Public Service Platform" undertaken by Kingsoft's public component is based on the Microsoft Component Object Model (COM) private technology. This private technology is contrary to the original intention (or purpose) of "863" and "Core-High-foundation ). So how did we generate a letter of approval from Kingsoft and a letter of reply to the subject matter website? There are only two possibilities: 1. Kingsoft declared the subject intentionally concealed the fact that the project was based on the Microsoft COM technology; 2. Kingsoft did not conceal the fact that the project was based on the COM technology during the project declaration, it is caused by the "carelessness" of the "nuclear high-key" Expert Group. In addition, what is the possibility?

As you know, the Component Object Model (COM) technology is implemented by Microsoft. It has a series of clearly defined objects and their attributes and methods, and is a private technical standard. We generally do not oppose the use of the COM technology. However, we specifically oppose the use of the private COM technology on top of the major software special issues of the "core-High-Foundation.

Now, the "foreign species" developed by the "nuclear high-foundation" have passed national acceptance, and subsidies and supporting funds have been spent. What should we do? Very embarrassing. A little money is spent, and the face of "core high-key" cannot be lost ....... What do I do with this? It is still interesting to do the "infinitely small calculus. What do you mean?