Why can I remove Lu Xun's articles from middle school textbooks?

When we get started, I support extracting Lu Xun's articles from middle school textbooks.

First, I would like to declare that I respect Mr. Lu Xun and have no intention of degrading his literary achievements. So why can I withdraw Lu Xun's article?

 

-- Helps to establish correct values.

The correct values should be those of creators and builders that are most respected. Unfortunately, we gave the highest praise to Lu Xun, a social critic. In middle school teaching materials (Confucius + Mencius + Xunzi + Zhu Xi + Wang Yangming), the land occupied is not as big as Lu Xun. What did Lu Xun do? It seems that the English Middle School textbooks do not publicize the stories of Shakespeare, Newton and Darwin, but instead promote a social critic.

 

To be ironic, Lu Xun ran Japan to learn medicine and came back to engage in social criticism. Japan has learned from the West. What do you say Lu Xun can learn? ? Will this kind of person be used as a god to confuse people's values?

 

Everyone has ideas, and even a good writer can become Lu Xun. However, whether or not the thought is right or not is a statement of the family is the height of the thought. Only those who criticize cannot reach this level. For example, both French and mojias criticize Confucianism, but they do not rely on criticism. They have their own ideas. What is Lu Xun's path? Are you sure you know?

From this perspective, it is necessary to reduce Lu Xun's articles from middle school textbooks and reduce the treatment of critics. It is even more necessary to add the articles by creators and builders so that they are more important than Lu Xun.

 

-- Helps purify people's minds.

Many people think that Lu Xun's criticism is of practical significance. Without Lu Xun, everyone will not criticize it. I thought that even if he criticized reality. But what is his purpose? What does he want to build? Lu Xun seems to have taken criticism and has not mentioned this. I guess it is because Lu Xun does not know what is right. So what can Middle School Students learn from it? In addition to sarcasm and criticism. At present, there was a lack of faith. After studying Lu Xun, not only did not help the establishment of faith, but also lost kindness.

 

-- It is conducive to learning the true classics.

I thought that Lu Xun's achievements have already occupied a position that should not be occupied, and it is time to give way. Confucianism, Taoism, Buddha, Christ, Islam, the literary philosophy of various Western schools, and famous scholars since May 4... Which of them is not more qualified to have a place? Why is there no manifestation of their spirit and doctrine, but Lu Xun's critical literature is brilliant?

Criticism is for construction. for creation, why not directly promote construction and creation, but learn to criticize this tool every day? Smooth? Curve saving the nation? I was afraid that I had forgotten why I wanted to criticize it. I only knew why I criticized it.

In fact, not all Middle School Students learn Lu Xun to sum up the central idea? It is suitable for studying these classical theories. Why should we summarize the central idea of Lu Xun's critical articles. Isn't that a mistake? If Lu Xun does not learn the literary talents, Lu Xun will not be able to rank any more. Is that true?

 

-- Is conducive to China's pearl process.

Let's look at the article on February's slow journey. After 49, Lu Xun's enemies were all political enemies, and every line of text in his work almost became truth, no one dares to make criticism. As a result, the question of "feep" is indeed completely abolished in the history of modern Chinese thoughts, cultural history, and moral history. The fact that "a slow trip" means "no" is a logical inference. Unfortunately, it turns into a historical fact.

Isn't there any fair play problem in China as the core issue of all questions in the current society? If Lu Xun is always made a saint, fair play will always be a derogatory term in the history of Chinese thoughts, cultural history, and moral history (if you are interested, you can go to Baidu encyclopedia to check the entry "Fei Er ). Pearl, is it possible?

 

-- Conducive to social justice.

I remember in a TV interview, a famous artist singing Peking Opera modern opera complained to the host about unfair treatment after the Cultural Revolution. As a result, some old people in the literary and art circles are angry: "You know what your peers are like when you get dressed and dressed like VIP in 1960s? They are waiting for food ." Yes. If the modern opera actors are still prosperous after WG, then there will be no social justice.

Turning back to Lu Xun, his articles, such as "On February should be slowed down" and "pain in the water dog", have brought the spirit of the ancient nine generations to the extreme. 49 and later, even more than Chinese people suffering from the fate-level heavy blow from the perspective of Lu. During the WG, all writer articles were banned, and Lu Xun was the only one. If the article eats people, it can be said that Lu Xun's article eats the most delicious and bloody food. As a result, WG was denied. Lu Xun still looked like a saint. What is social justice?

 

I really admire Lu Xun. However, we recommend that you withdraw from the middle school teaching materials.