The difference between Linux server and Windows Server
What are the advantages of using Linux as a server versus Windows Server?
First, the average failure time is less, and as long as it is configured and used properly, the average failure of Linux (which requires shutdown or restart) is more than a year,
Restarting maintenance once a year isn't too much, is it? Can windows restart only once a year?
Second, Unix-like from the file system from the strict security mechanism, the simplest example, windows you put any file extension exe has executable permissions, Linux needs to use chmod plus execution bit, no execution bit even if the file is executable,
Nor does it have access to the system resources that are needed to execute, which is why Linux is not susceptible to viruses.
Of course, there are also hackers who modify the system's existing scripts to achieve the purpose of execution destruction, but this scope of destruction is quite small,
Because all scripts have their performers, and the performer has the permissions that the script has, the script does not exceed this limit, and the normal running server rarely has a script that runs as Superuser, and a script running as a normal user cannot do much damage. The owner of most files on the file system is Superuser, and the identity of the ordinary user cannot be rewritten.
Besides, the management of Linux on memory,
Linux can automatically unload the device's drivers from memory when the device is not in use to save memory usage.
Windows can? Linux can be completely without graphics, all services and applications through the shell configuration and startup,
Windows has less graphics and nothing, and its command line is less powerful.
Note: The contents of the essay are from the online data collation, for reference only.
Windows Server server's Linux server differs from Windows Server