10 key points to Luo the scene against the King

Hammer Phone founder Luo and independent evaluation agency Zealer founder Wang freely live confrontation, tonight. As a new mobile phone brand, hammer and Luo by virtue of feelings, serious, craftsmen and other labels to capture the eye, life and death in this is already a blood of the smart phone industry to kill a path. and Zealer and freely also in the last two years of mobile phone evaluation by virtue of professional, objective and other labels, become the most influential evaluation of the organization. Visit More Videos: http://v.youku.com/v_show/id_XNzYyNzAwNjky.html?f=22785246 Previously, the two people in the micro-blog relationship is very close and friendly. However, the relationship between the two men deteriorated rapidly with the advent of the Zealer Hammer T1 evaluation video. According to netizens, this video of the overall evaluation of the hammer is quite negative, and a sentence you can be serious, but can not be self-willed is the relationship between the two to push the situation. There are netizens and insiders suspected that zealer because of the millet, oppo and other industries in the mobile phone companies, and made a negative evaluation. and Zealer and freely I clearly deny this speculation. What is the objective or not? The author does not speculate motives, this article will be summed up this confrontation in the ten key information points, to be judged by netizens. 1. Overall perception: Lao Luo is strong and logical and full of humility there is no justification for this confrontation in general, it is clear to see Luo mastered the rhythm, and logical integrity, ready to full. From the large cardboard ppt can be seen, Luo's thinking logic is, first set out freely evaluation is not so professional, there is a lot of mishap, secondly, the Zealer video has deliberately black suspicion, again that zealer investors are mobile phone enterprises, can not be objective, At the same time attack Zealer repair service for orders from the gray channel, there is a suspicion of illegality. In a relaxed way, the beginning of a humble response, and then unable to control the debate. In the process of being interrupted again and again, and following the logic of old Luo, there is no justification at all. 2. The loss of the debate and the significance of the confrontation for the same brand of idealism of the two companies and two people, this debate can not lose both sides, if the loss, the old lost is the product, the king freely lost is the evaluation of the value of No. Both have defended themselves in their respective positions. And the significance of confrontation, as the United States President of the significance of the debate, who can not be persuaded who? The key is to convince the audience in front of the television. This confrontation, the most important thing is to talk with the computer users before. 3. The crushing nature of the hammer for this, the old man happily admits that the hammer is one of the most fragile handsets at the moment. At ease, the hammer should improve its robustness, and the old man insists that for the sake of beauty, the fragile nature should not be a test point for a mobile phone or a good one, and take an example of an iphone 4来. 4. Fuselage structure sponge and heat dissipation problems in the evaluation video, the body of the sponge to prevent the machine's heat dissipation. And old Luo thought that the increase of the spongeInstead, it increases the heat conduction and the heat dissipation effect. 5. Line and assembly process complexity in the evaluation video, said the line exists in the machine folding 20 percent, resulting in complex assembly. In the case of Foxconn, the old man said that modern-day factories would have professional equipment to solve these problems without increasing the complexity. 6. Electrostatic problem free to take out the test report said, hammer phone anti-static not up to national standards. Mr. Luo said that this issue needs to go back to confirm the study, if there is a problem, then admit the mistake, improve, and warranty to the end. 7. Screen visual angle suspense and brightness problem in this part, the old Luo said he was free to use shooting angle deliberately black hammer. The same JDI screen, three shots of different angles, led to the hammer in the most disadvantageous position, thus inducing the user to form the wrong judgment. At ease, this is the staff's unintentional, while insisting that the visual angle of the hammer screen is not as good as the other machines in the evaluation. And the same about the screen brightness problem, freely think hammer phone level is not good, and old Luo think they have been used in addition to Apple Samsung outside the best screen, no problem. 8. Camera white balance and purple edge problem Old Luo said, the camera automatic algorithm is a lot of instability. The reviewers deliberately change their perspective, and can draw purposeful results. The controversy over this issue will be validated by actual reality shots. 9. Regarding the independent and the third party Lao Luo discloses the Zealer investment side is millet, OPPO, VIVO, Gionee four domestic manufacturers, since has the manufacturer investment, is not independent, the third party. It is easy to insist that, because the manufacturers do not have the right to vote, Zealer is independent. 10. With regard to grey channels and business ethics Old Luo pointed out that the accessories used in the Zealer maintenance service were obtained from the Apple Grey Channel, and this practice is illegal. And feel comfortable with the current industry status quo, he promised to take the goods from the supplier is legal, as for the supplier is how the gray channel, he can not control. At the same time, Mr. Luo said the hammer asked Zealer to make a paid consultant and pointed out many problems. Then I said there was no problem, and then I did a video review to point out the new problem. In this respect, Lao Luo said this practice is against commercial ethics.