150 million low-rent housing protection funds were misappropriated 34 projects to obtain subsidies 61.29 million

This reporter Cui Peng November 17, the Audit commission released 19 provinces from 2007 to 2009 government investment in housing audit findings.　　2009 and 2010, the audit commission two times in Beijing, Tianjin, Shanxi and other 19 provinces and cities of the 2007 to 2009 Low-rent Housing security situation and the fourth quarter of 2008, the central investment subsidy of the shanty town of the reconstruction of the survey, focusing on the investigation of 32 cities above ground level. Low-rent housing security work rapid development--3 years, the protection of funds increased by 6.25 times times, the total number of households to increase 2.58 times times the audit survey results show that from 2007 to 2009, 19 provinces and cities to raise low-cost housing security funds of 103.88 billion yuan, access to squatter settlements to transform the central subsidy funds 5.443 billion yuan. The 32 cities that focus on the investigation raise the low Rent Housing guarantee fund 44.865 billion yuan, among them: the Central subsidy Fund 6.725 billion yuan, accounted for 14.99%; from the land sale net income and the housing Accumulation fund increment income to arrange 29.679 billion yuan, accounts for 66.15% The local financial arrangement of 5.247 billion yuan, accounting for 11.7%, other channels to raise 3.214 billion yuan, accounting for 7.16%.　　A low-cost housing security expenditure of 21.911 billion yuan, to the end of 2009, the accumulated balance of 27.797 billion yuan. The director of the Social Security Division of the Audit Office said that since 2007, 19 provinces and cities to increase the low-cost housing security investment, the formulation of relevant normative documents, clear the low rent housing security work objectives, the implementation of work responsibilities, effectively promoted the Low-cost housing security work quickly. 19 provinces and municipalities raised the Low-cost housing security funds from 2007 to increase the 8.861 billion yuan to 2009 64.226 billion yuan, increased by 6.25 times times, the total number of households from 690,300 to 2.4693 million, increasing by 2.58 times times; by the end of 2009, 32 cities in the focus of the survey had a low rent housing guarantee　　The barrier range is extended to low-income housing-disadvantaged families by families with the lowest living security. 22 Cities to extract low-cost housing security funds proportion is not standard--Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing, Chengdu and other cities total less than 14.623 billion yuan in accordance with the provisions, all over the net income from the land transfer of low-cost housing security funds for the proportion must not be less than 10%. However, the audit found that the proportion of 22 cities in Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing and Chengdu from the net income from land transfer did not meet the above requirements.　　From 2007 to 2009, the total number of these cities was less than 14.623 billion yuan. Why does this problem occur? First, a number of economically developed cities land transfer net income base is large, the previous annual extraction of low-cost housing security funds plus other channels raised funds can meet a certain period of low-cost housing security needs, thus reducing the proportion of the extraction; second, some cities to land transfer net income has not yet made accurate accounting, resulting in the failure to mention or reduce the low rent housing security funds.　　The audit pointed out the above problems, as at the end of August 2010, in addition to the Tianjin City said that through other channels to raise funds for Low-cost housing has met the demand, the remaining 21 cities or in the audit pointed out that the problem of the year, increased the strength of low-cost housing construction funds, or committed to the future strictly according To ensure that low-cost housing security funds in full place.　　BEIJING, Shanghai and other 11 cities also from the land transfer Net income to supplement the previous year's low-rent housing security funds 3.861 billion yuan. Deviations in the implementation of the policy-2132 families who do not meet the conditions of the family receive a subsidy, 13,200 households turn lease subsidy into "subsistence subsidy" in the 32 cities surveyed, 18 cities issued low-rent housing rental subsidy 4.1312 million yuan to 2132 families who did not meet the conditions, and distributed low-cost housing 533 sets　　, a sample of 22 cities in the Low-rent housing protection family, 13,200 households did not apply the lease subsidy to improve housing conditions, but for other household consumption, so that the rental subsidy into a "subsistence subsidy." The main reasons: first, the audit and supervision of the protection of the system is not sound, population changes, income and property information has not yet been shared, the relevant departments do not accurately and timely grasp of relevant information; second, because some local low-rent housing rental subsidy standard is low, most of the protection objects residing in the old City　　Rental subsidies and low-cost housing to protect the family's own economic capacity is difficult to rent a suitable housing. The audit noted that, as at the end of August 2010, 18 municipalities had suspended rental subsidies for 1569 families who were not eligible for a low-rent housing rental subsidy, The recovery of low-rent housing rental subsidy is 864,700 yuan, the 533 sets of low-cost housing allocated to those who do not meet the conditions, have repaying 107 sets, and the remaining 426 sets are in the process of repaying.　　On suspicion of fraud to defraud low-cost rental housing rental subsidy of 5 grass-roots staff, the relevant units have been given the dismissal, the administrative record is greater than the punishment. In the case of low-rent housing leasing subsidy not used or not fully used to improve housing conditions, the Governments concerned are actively exploring how to rectify the procedures, forms and follow-up supervision of leasing subsidy.　　If the Jinan and Taian plan to take measures to link the rental subsidy to the actual expenses of rental housing, some of the districts of Haikou and Shenzhen have taken measures to remedy the subsidy by providing a housing lease agreement. Some local facilities are not perfect--13 cities such as Nanjing, the emergence of low-cost rental housing rental difficulties, availability and other problems due to low-cost housing facilities, remote location, traffic inconvenience, etc., Nanjing, and other 13 cities in some parts of the city of Low-cost rental housing rental difficulties, the availability of idle problems,　　Some places have even been checked out of their homes.　　Nanjing, Kunming and other 13 cities to invest 1.26 billion yuan new, acquired or renovated low-cost housing projects, there is the implementation of bidding or government procurement related provisions are not strict issues. The audit noted the above issues, as at 2010 8At the end of the month, 11 cities such as Leshan, Yancheng and so on to improve the road, transportation, water and electricity and other ancillary facilities and speed up the process of rent rental housing and other measures to rectify; Xi ' an city and Quanzhou proposed to improve supporting facilities and speed up the allocation of work plans.　　For the new, acquisition or renovation of low-rent housing projects did not carry out bidding or government procurement related provisions, the city has strengthened the project bidding management, of which the Nanjing, Shenzhen, Yancheng Three cities dedicated to the deployment of the relevant work, the establishment of normative documents. There are some problems such as rent, property charge and so on--12 cities such as Tianjin, which owe rent and property costs 2.3805 million yuan in the 32 cities surveyed, Tianjin, Shenyang, Chongqing and other 12 cities as of the end of 2009, the accumulated arrears of rent and rental housing rental and property costs 2.3805 million yuan; Shenyang, Xiamen, Changde, Chengdu　　, Leshan, Kunming, 6 cities in 20 districts and counties exist not in line with the security conditions of low-cost housing family exit difficult problem.　　The main reason: first, the arrears of rent, refusing to withdraw from low-rent housing, lack of effective measures and clear provisions; the second is that some of the families in the low-rent housing, in their income changes have not met the physical distribution conditions, most still unable to purchase new housing, to vacate their existing low-rent housing is indeed difficult. After the audit noted the above issues, as at the end of August 2010, Chongqing, Guangzhou and other 7 cities to take household billing, household reminders and other measures to increase the rent, property costs of the urge to pay, Chongqing, Pingliang and other land to take paid work to deduct rent or hire the community staff to undertake property services and other measures to a certain extent to ease the rent,　　The problem of charging for property charges is difficult. Some places have misappropriation of funds and other issues--150 million yuan Low-cost rental protection funds were misappropriated, 34 projects to take the grant of 61.29 million yuan in the focus of 32 cities, 6 cities and 4 counties will be low-cost housing security funds to buy back the house and work expenses,　　A total of 152.313 million yuan, 6 cities in 34 projects using false declaration materials, such as the new Low-cost housing central budget investment subsidy of 61.29 million yuan.　　The audit pointed out the above problems, as of the end of August 2010, the audit found that the misappropriation of low-cost housing security funds have been fully returned, the use of false materials to take the new Low-cost housing central budget investment subsidy funds have been through the adjustment of the project or the way to complete the rectification process. In addition, the audit investigation also found that and to the relevant departments to transfer illegal and criminal cases of clues 1, the relevant departments are in accordance with the law to investigate and punish. At present, there are 1 Deputy-hall-level and 1-level cadres were arrested in accordance with the law, at the same time were expelled from the party and public office, 1 are at the level of administrative dismissal and Rectifies 2 years, the private developers involved 1 people were arrested by law, 1 were on bail pending trial.