150 million protection funds were embezzled 22 cities less extraction 14.6 billion

Audit report of 19 provinces and cities for low-rent housing security reports reporter Liu Jianyun, He Ying Audit Office yesterday released 19 provinces from 2007 to 2009 Low-rent Housing security situation and 2008 fourth quarter, the central investment subsidy of squatter settlements reform audit investigation report.　　The report shows that from 2007 to 2009, 19 provinces and cities to raise low-cost housing security funds 103.88 billion yuan, access to shanty towns to transform the central subsidy funds 5.443 billion yuan. A deputy hall was arrested the audit investigation also found that and to the relevant departments to transfer illegal and criminal cases of clues to 1, the relevant departments are under the law to investigate and punish.　　At present, there are 1 Deputy-hall-level and 1-level cadres were arrested in accordance with the law, at the same time were expelled from the party and public office, 1 are at the level of administrative dismissal and Rectifies 2 years, the private developers involved 1 people were arrested by law, 1 were on bail pending trial. 22 The proportion of urban security funds is not up to the standard according to the provisions, all over the net income from the land transfer of low-cost housing protection funds should not be less than 10%. But the proportion of 22 cities such as Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing and Chengdu from the net income from land transfer has not met the above requirements.　　From 2007 to 2009, the total number of these cities was less than 14.623 billion yuan. It is reported that the main reasons: first, some economically developed cities land transfer net income base is large, the previous year, the collection of Low-cost housing security funds and other channels to raise funds can meet a certain period of low rent housing security needs, thus reducing the proportion of the extraction　　The second is that some cities have not made accurate accounting for the net income of land transfer, which leads to not mentioning or mentioning low rent housing security funds. Some places to take misappropriation of the security funds report pointed out that some places have to take, misappropriation of low-cost housing security funds and so on. Of the 32 cities surveyed, there are 6 cities and 4 counties will be low-cost housing security funds to buy back to housing and work expenses such as expenditure, a total of 152.313 million yuan, 6 cities 34 projects using false declaration materials, such as the new Low-cost housing central budget investment subsidy funds 61.29 million yuan.　　By the end of August 2010, the audit found that the misappropriation of low-cost housing security funds have been returned to 152.313 million yuan, the use of false materials to take the subsidy funds have been adjusted by the project or the way to complete the rectification process. 18 cities violating the subsidy audit also found that of the 32 cities surveyed, 18 cities issued low-rent housing rental subsidy of 4.1312 million yuan to 2132 families who did not meet the conditions, and distributed 533 units of low-rent housing, and checked the Low-cost housing security families in 22 cities, 13,200 households did not use the lease subsidy as a provision to improve housing conditions, but to other household consumption, which turned the rental subsidy into a "subsistence subsidy". The main reason: first, the security of the object of audit and supervision mechanism is not perfect, population changes, income and property information has not yet been shared, the relevant departments are not accurateTimely grasp of the relevant information; second, because some local low-rent housing rental subsidy standard is low, most of the objects living in the Old city, by leasing subsidies and low-cost housing to protect the family's own economic ability to rent suitable housing.　　By the end of August 2010, 18 cities had suspended rental subsidies for 1569 families who had not met the rental subsidy for low-rent housing, and had recovered 864,700 yuan for the rental subsidy for low-rent housing.　　12 cities due to rent in arrears the audit also found that some local low-rent housing after the occupancy of rent, property charges difficult and do not meet the conditions of household withdrawal difficulties. Of the 32 cities surveyed, Tianjin, Shenyang, Chongqing and other 12 cities as of the end of 2009, the accumulated arrears of low-rent housing rental and property costs of 2.3805 million yuan; Shenyang, Xiamen, Changde, Chengdu, Leshan, Kunming, 6 cities in 20 counties in the city have not meet the security conditions of low-cost housing family exit difficult problem.　　The main reason: first, the arrears of rent, refusing to withdraw from low-rent housing is lack of effective measures and clear provisions; the second is that some of the families in the low-rent housing, in their income changes have not met the physical distribution conditions, most still unable to purchase new housing, to vacate their existing low-rent housing is indeed difficult.　　By the end of August 2010, Chongqing, Guangzhou and other 7 cities to take household billing, household reminders and other measures to increase the rent, property charges, to a certain extent, to alleviate the rent, property charges difficult to collect the problem. 13 Cities Low-cost Rental Housing report pointed out that Nanjing and other 13 cities in the existence of low-cost rental accommodation, the availability of idle problems, and some even have checked out of the family. One of the reasons is that low-rent housing facilities are imperfect, the address is remote, the traffic is inconvenient. The second reason is that in Nanjing, Kunming and other 13 cities to invest 1.26 billion yuan new, acquired or renovated low-cost housing projects, there is the implementation of bidding or government procurement regulations are not strict issues.