32 Central Enterprises listed SASAC performance assessment A-level

Xinhua Beijing, July 21, the State Council 21st, disclosed in the 2008 of the Central Enterprise performance assessment results.　　Of the 145 central enterprises that are included in the SASAC assessment (or test evaluation), 32 are rated as the optimal grade A. In this central Enterprise performance assessment "report Card", a class of enterprises 32, accounting for 22.07%, FAW Group, National Machinery Group, China building Materials, China CRCC and coal industry workers first entered a class. B-Class Enterprises 74, accounting for 51.03%, 8 enterprises from C-class into the B-class. C-Class Enterprises 34, accounting for 23.45%.　　Class D Enterprise 5, accounting for 3.45%.　　It is reported that, according to the "Central Enterprise Management Performance Assessment interim measures", the central Enterprise annual business performance Assessment final results are divided into a, B, C, D, E Five levels, complete the evaluation target value of C-level point. 2008, the central enterprise faced with the changeable business environment. Serious natural disasters, major policy benefits, international financial crisis and other factors have increased the difficulty of production and operation of central enterprises.　　Although most enterprises have completed performance evaluation indicators, but 2008 a-level, B-class enterprise total households is the performance appraisal system since the establishment of a minimum of 2004 years outside the year. It is understood that SASAC in the assessment of the comprehensive consideration of major natural disasters, major policy losses, financial crisis, Olympic security impact and other factors, nuclear data, strict assessment rating.　　In addition to the earthquake disaster and major policy factors, for other factors to adjust the evaluation target or completion value of the central enterprises, in principle, can not enter a level. For the steel and transportation enterprises, SASAC also carried out performance evaluation in the assessment, reasonable determination of performance evaluation results. The enterprise that the total profit has exceeded the target value above 50%, and the net assets return is over 5% of the target value, has been treated with the deduction. For the enterprises with more accidents in production, more serious nature or larger losses, the enterprise, which is identified as an accident and has reached the deduction standard, has carried out the deduction treatment. In some enterprises, the loss of state-owned assets has been dealt with by deduction.　　For 5 of the enterprises entrusted with the entrusted task, the bonus points were given. For the Board of Directors Pilot Enterprises (in addition to China's mobile China railcom), SASAC in accordance with the audit work principles and policies, conducted a test evaluation.　　4 companies for A-level, 1 more than the previous year, 6 companies for B-class, a reduction of 4 from the previous year, 6 enterprises for the C-class, compared to the previous year 4, 1 enterprises for the D-level. Li, director of Sasac, said that from the overall perspective, the results of the assessment and corporate efficiency trends are consistent.　　The ranking of the evaluation results is not the ranking of the comprehensive assessment of the leading group and the responsible person, but the ranking of the management performance. He said that the assessment is the means is not the goal, the enterprise is mainly responsible for the comrades should be good at using this assessment results, guide the cadres and workers in efforts to improve the work of enterprises, strengthen and domestic and foreign industry benchmarking enterprises, find their own weaknesses and gaps, and effectively improve the enterprise management level, To create a better business performance.