A brief review of the use of Pjblog and Z-blog

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Use the ASP personal blog probably know Pjblog and Z-blog. I would like to say the latest version of pjblog3v3.0.6.170 and Z-blog 1.8 Arwen build 81206 after the use of a little feeling, for reference only.

Use PJ users can edit, delete posts in the foreground, and send new posts to be completed at the front desk. ZB is done in the background. You can also use the plugin to display the Edit button in the foreground, but still skip to the background edit. ZB can realize the free conversion of UBB and visual editing, while PJ can only choose to use UBB or FCK when sending articles.

The front skin of the interface design preset, PJ's is a bit nicer. Backstage beauty and ease of use is also PJ better. A slight shortage of ZB. And the preset content is slightly close.

Both sides of the website have a lot of beautiful skin. Overall design level of the skin, I still choose PJ. PJ's skin production and modification is also relatively simple, is CSS and pictures, you can edit the static template and CSS online. ZB Skin is a dedicated bag. It is slightly more complex to make, and contains static HTML. If someone adds an ad code to the template, it's also bad for the user. But its background can automatically update the theme, the function is good.

Plugins for both plug-ins can be installed and uninstalled online. But many of PJ's plug-ins are not available after the static log is turned on. And on the function of plug-ins, practicality, level, quantity, ZB obviously occupy the advantage. Williamlong, bus flying and other big stars write Plug-ins is very good.

Module PJ's module is relatively simple. You can add content and side modules freely, and edit the modules. System modules are also more. Calendar, navigation, files, links and other commonly used. However, the system modules are displayed on each page. The added module cannot be displayed on a static page unless it is changed to a static template. ZB does not have this function in the background, only by editing the static template to achieve. Of course, DIY is higher.

SEO Focus, on this I can only say my opinion. PJ's SEO reputation has been good. PJ3 finally realized the static log, the background has dynamic, semi static and static three modes of free switching. The latest version of 170 to achieve the log alias and log automatic or manual fill keywords and description, I believe it will cause a good response. The new version of ZB ignores keywords and description, and the output of HTML is completely without their shadow. Probably through the plug-in to achieve it. But the ZB is a powerful place to customize the static log directory configuration. You can generate an address like http://www.dangbao.net/article/data/pjblog-z-blog/. We all know http://www.dangbao.net/article/data/pjblog-z-blog/default.html weights are higher than http://www.dangbao.net/article/data/pjblog-z-blog.html. This and WP also really have a fight. Of course the directory depth of the log can be customized. Praise one. The other little thing, PJ's belt is more comprehensive.

Looking at the overall situation, I personally think that pjblog more suitable for the visual editing requirements, the plug-in function requirements are not high users; Z-blog is suitable to have a certain foundation, pay attention to function, like DIY user.