A dialectical perspective on China's economic transformation

BEIJING, Suzhou, December 5 (Zhao Zhou Jianlin) "China's economy is really going to transition, but to gradually, to overcome the metaphysical, the transformation is not an abstract slogan, to conform to China's national conditions."　　At the second annual meeting of the SU-Shang Development conference today, the Secretary-General of Boao Forum for Asia has called for a dialectical view of China's economic transformation. In his view, China's economic restructuring should be based on the growing manufacturing industry, and China's path to developing services on the basis of manufacturing is correct.　　In order to build up the process of industrialization and urbanization, this is the two basic motive force of China's economic development, which is extremely important.　　Data show that last year when the financial crisis swept the world, China's total foreign trade fell more than 20%, footwear, bags and other labor-intensive industries fell by only 10%, indicating that, in the process of China's participation in the entire international division of labor, labor-intensive enterprises in a long period of time or China's advantage.　　"With, Hair", the dialectical relationship between the use of the fur to describe the service industry to the basic dependence of the manufacturing industry. "We must not forget that China is still in the middle of the industrialization of the basic national conditions, the process of industrialization can not exclude traditional industries, but should be supported to improve."　　"He stressed repeatedly that there is no sunset of the industry, only the sunset technology; there is no polluting industry, only the technology of pollution." For the present many places use the administrative district to examine the appraisal one area industry to be optimized to upgrade, this is not a good practice. He said that this will easily cause local cadres to cheat, not to seek truth from facts, in the transformation and escalation of the issue, must be more "dialectics", Less "metaphysics." Finish)