A large and rigid organization

&http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/37954.html ">nbsp; Large organizations, which have huge resources, have the right to market discourse, and this large organization, and in the current historical conditions, large organizations will face a grim choice.

Large organizations never have the flexibility to walk freely.

When we are trying to remind us of what we should do every day with various tools, our lives do not have the human meaning of ourselves. Every morning the alarm clock wakes us up at regular hours, then we had a fixed reminder at lunch time, because there was a meeting one o'clock in the afternoon, we had to finish at least half an hour before one o'clock, because we had to prepare the material for the meeting-if you don't want to get a soy sauce, we eat and take a walk at a fixed time Or whether there is a discount on the market around us or on the Internet-to supplement the household is an equally important work outside of work.

We change our inertia in an extra compelling way without resorting to our habitual actions, and as a result, all actions are forced to change inertia, but we are otherwise inert-we tend not to rely on alarms or other forms of information. The result appears to be delays such as the work or things that we want to do.

Non-subjective change becomes the reason why large organizations rely more and more on tools, and this kind of rigidity is an inert way of management.

Under this inert and rigid system, the bureaucracy of large organizations began to overflow.

Members of the Organization on the basis of such a good line and the way forward, according to the established procedures to walk through his prescribed lines, to large organizations in the form of a good way to achieve the final requirements of large organizations. The members of the Organization have no right to vote and cannot present their opinions, even if you have to swallow them to your stomach. Members of the organization are all in the way of action, and the Organization will not let you move toward a goal that is different from what it sets out to be, otherwise, the result will be that you are no longer a member of the larger organization-or more severely punished.

Bureaucracy is the essential organization of large organizations, its inherent soul is rigid.

When a large organization moves forward in the course of action, the production of positive results can only occur in the early industrialized society, and the current mutation in the new tense, its unified model does not make its achievements appear to be outstanding, only produce frustrating efficiency. Caden called it a narrow phenomenon of seeking, which was costly:

Narrow-mindedness, restrictions on individual ambition and creativity, unbearable obedience, competent but not outstanding performance, and mediocre complacency. If we accept the reality, then everything seems to be fine, and the future is just a repetition of reality ... When bureaucracy goes to extremes, its flaws will replace its virtues. In this case, bureaucracy is not a prudent plan, but it is often impromptu to make some decisions, the implementation of which is often a rush, whether decision-making or implementation is not deliberate and hasty, and often lead to chaos of order. Due to the tedious routine of the work, the performance of the staff and the less performance of the staff in the pay is not much difference, the result is not the increase in productivity, but the reduction in productivity. (Quoted from "Introduction to Public administration", page 43, (O) Owen · E. Hughes, Zhang Chengfu, Wang Xudong, Renmin University Press)

When all the members of the Organization are incorporated into such a bureaucratic system, the way of behaving is also an outward manifestation of this bureaucratic character, the systematic differentiation rarely occurs, and the internal environment is the same every year, and even the smiles of the members seem to you. A rigid system eliminates any other system that is different from the organization and crushes it completely. Programmatic work eliminates the possibility of change because the bud is wiped out at the beginning of growth.

Large organizations have unparalleled stability.

It has the resources to meet the different needs of the organization to the fullest extent possible. Any of their needs are taken from within, with a large degree of disregard for foreign resources, bordering on indifference. Large organizations put their own collection of resources into the altar, thinking it omnipotent.

But the nature of the resources has undergone an astonishing change. He is not just a matter of form, it is not only the relationship between human relationships or their own emotional relationship, but information, services, skills or professional forms. This form is no longer a deposit of material form, it has natural fluidity, which is the true form of its existence.

When verifying an idea is correct or not, the traditional form is to experiment continuously, the result of experiment is nothing but failure and success, but the validity of the traditional form of validating truth is doubtful in today's world. When the form of service is linked to countless possibilities, the method of making assumptions and then validating them is very inefficient.

It is a pity that large organizations are naturally insensitive to such changes, and they have a strong confidence in the resources they possess, and there is no need to worry about anything that is unnecessary.

March 14, 2010, BCC published an article, the author said such a passage:

Back in 1998, the country's state-owned assets a total annual profit of only 21.3 billion yuan, more than 2/3 of the state-owned enterprises losses. "Saving state-owned enterprises in near-death" became the most noticeable topic in the late 90 's. At that time, "save the state-owned enterprise Movement", the state's capital injection, international and domestic capital market financing, debt-to-equity swap, Central reserve, discount loans, the country spent more than 2 trillion yuan, is a national force. (March 14, 2010, BCC Network "state-owned enterprises accounted for more than 60% of social resources to GDP growth contribution less than 30%")

The article also on the 2008 "bailout" capital flow to do the explanation, 90% to the large and medium-sized state-owned enterprises.

The system of coping with the crisis is not yet capable of resisting risk, so it's always so easy for the big organizations to collapse, and the policy orientation should be brave to devote themselves to the wrong time, which is not a thing to be proud of. When confronted with the brutal choices of the market, large organizations become sluggish under the direction of policy, thus falling into an inert coping state, so that the rigidity of action is taken for granted.

In which the members of the large organizations, they also show a step by step situation, their work life in the founding of the chain in the big organization, become a jump not far from the grasshopper. Space Beyond society has no space at all to live in, be born in organization, longer than organization, and then die of organization. After opening up, despite the different opportunities to change the larger organization itself, this opportunity has been eliminated indirectly under the leadership of the policy. But the individual is ultimately a pluralistic nature attached to its body, which is endowed with innate nature, but personalized divergence in the organization was completely grinding out of the spirit, personalized development so that the organization members can only dream back to such beautiful scenery. The organization's possession of resources makes the resources of individuals scarce, and the degree of control of such resources is not the individual can relax, so the organization members were molded into a model of the same breathing, standing in the group of organizations to show the overall style of the organization.