About three o'clock SEO theory I'm just expressing my opinion.

Absrtact: In A5 home, there is an article to refute: Seoer You really think these theories are useless, see the original author of the SEO theory of three false original article can not bring value to users, low quality chain on the ranking is worthless, PR is not worth seoer concern,

On the A5 homepage, there was an article "retort: Seoer do you really think that these theories are useless?", see the original author of the SEO Theory of three "false original article can not bring value to users," "low quality chain to rank worthless", "PR is not worth seoer attention", These three points illustrate their own views, perhaps when you see these three points, you will agree with the original author's point of view, for example, in the 1th "false original article can not bring value to users," the author's view is "users do not need to appreciate the original and literary writing, They just want to see an article that will help them, this article is not limited to the source "; The three-point reading, I feel that the very good, but, if it is my three points, it would like to express their views.

1, false original articles can not bring value to users

The original author's point of view is very good, but it feels that the explanation is not in place, in fact, every article has its meaning, we just need to appear in the relevant articles, and not be false original article misleading, feeling that this small paragraph theme should be called, "copy pasted articles can not bring value to users" It will be a little bit better. In my opinion, each article has its own characteristics, whether original or copied, as long as the corresponding user number, that is reasonable.

You don't see Sina, Tencent, NetEase three content exactly the same, but still will get a lot of weight accumulation, because there are users to see, because these are suitable for their users, so there is, there are the following truth, in the verification of the place to appear the right article, this is what we need. If you are a novel website, you will agree to it? Will your users agree? Maybe it will go to you and say how your site appears to be irrelevant.

The value of this thing, or according to the theme of the Web site, not as put anything, you have to consider what to put, and the content is irrelevant, but it is their original, can be copied, but, copy and original or there will be a certain distinction, how to distinguish it, you need to distinguish according to the characteristics of the site.

For example, most of the articles on A5 are original, many webmaster types of articles are collected A5 (many are set the time to collect their own update released, and then basically the same content), this site is also belong to the appropriate site? It must be good for their users to see such an article. That's right! So, these articles are all right, but, this kind of website ignores one thing, that is characteristic, if I ask you this kind of website to have characteristic? You must say, No. Characteristic is a website success must have, has lets oneself can show off the thing, such website can and other collects the website to differentiate, is finally we need the article and the topic sex.

2, PR is not worth seoer attention

PR, do not want to talk about Google's pr,pr what is said, is a site link recommended it, in the Google mechanism is also very important point, but since the BR came out, many people will be linked to the attention of the link on the BR, PR also slowly lost the status of the past, Then the PR in the end value is not worth our attention. Then I try to ask you this, in the flow and PR between what you choose, you will certainly choose the flow, in BR and PR between what you choose, you definitely choose br (although BR is a brush, but the most authentic BR weight value do you want?) it is beyond doubt that I do not pay much attention to PR, Because the update is done to some extent, as long as you have a certain age of the site, the number of the chain has a certain, on 3, on the 4, 5 are natural things, pay attention to not pay attention to, pay attention to do a few outside the chain every day, better find more interesting articles, always more powerful than these.

3, low quality outside the chain to the rank of nothing (high quality and low quality)

Outside the chain of this, the individual is to feel high quality and low quality are meaningful, in fact, it is very simple to distinguish, try to ask yourself, what is the quality of the outside chain? Some people would say that the high quality of the chain is on those large sites outside the chain, the weight of a high page of an export link; what is the low quality of the outer chain, Many people say, like those blog messages ah, forum signature Ah, and so on, are, a page has hundreds of outside the chain, that is certainly low quality. These are the views of many friends, and my view of high quality links is this.

A: For the user's useful outside the chain, is high-quality, you will say what links to users useful, yes ah, what kind of outside the chain useful, for example, you reprint an article, and then finally left the original address, then the user saw, think this article useful, directly clicked in, and finally saw this person more articles, So this link is for the user meaningful, is a valuable outside the chain, this link is to the user meaningful outside the chain. Then it derives into the forum, we often say in the relevance of the content to do relevance, nothing more than to add a link in the content, and then let users click in the content of the link quality is relatively good, is to guide users to click, is a certain value, high-quality links is this truth.

B: No use of the outside chain, here is what I call low quality outside the chain, is for the user has no value outside the chain, we most often see is the sale of the black chain, the user can not see the natural will not click, this link is not what to use, for example, the trade site in the sale of links, many people buy, think these links quality is very good, Because the chain of these connections have been clicked on the possibility, then there is a certain quality, at least is the Ming chain, but when there are hundreds of links, this quality will be how high? What links do you think it is good to see the link for users have no desire to click it

summed up, forum signature is not necessarily bad, because it may be the user of this post to bring a certain amount of traffic, but, the effect is absolutely no concern in the text of the link in the high degree of concern, if you can, let the link out of the content now, if you can click, then heartily click it.