Analysis of FDD LTE frequency distribution: Balance or imbalance?

It is said that China's FDD LTE band has been divided, the attention of the B3 high-end 1755~1785mhz (uplink, to the same below) to the telecommunications, B1 high-end 1940~1960mhz to the Unicom. Balance or imbalance? A look, this is an unbalanced solution, because the mobile in the 2GHz to distribute the band, after distribution, mobile, unicom and telecommunications in the 2GHz bandwidth number of 30:55:50, reasonable method should be everyone keeled, will B1 and B3 frequency of 135M bandwidth distribution, B3 Band each take 25M,B1 band 20M, performing a three of the drama of the Jin. Careful consideration, the present plan has great meaning, in fact, a higher level of balance, how to say? That is to combine 1GHZ band distribution to consider. In 1GHz, Mobile, unicom and telecommunications bandwidth of the number of 19:6:10, mobile obviously dominant. You know, 1GHz is the Golden Band, the value of at least 2GHz band twice times, if we give the 1G band a weighted coefficient of 2, then the last three FDD bandwidth value is 68:67:70, almost exactly the same, it seems that managers still have a little brains. What is the best value for telecommunications? After this division, many people think that is the victory of telecommunications, and achieved a big fat, I think not necessarily. 1800M is expected, that is because 1800M is the way to GSM development, from GSM upgrade to LTE, no need to replace the antenna, if the rru design well, no need to replace Rru, in short, wireless network can be upgraded from GSM smooth to LTE. However, the 1800M to make the value of telecommunications is much smaller, the only advantage is the 1~1.5db of the link budget advantages, this is not to replace the antenna, free replacement rru, the gap is not one or two street. Unicom steals music? Originally did not fight for B1 high-end, finally gave, formed 40MHz of continuous bandwidth, unicom is not a reason to le it? Wait, what's the new 20MHz for? LTE? LTE coverage, performance and hspa++ compared, there is no advantage, the only advantage is MIMO, but this is only Tim header. LTE also needs CSFB, too much trouble. And now support LTE terminal, certainly also support HSPA, duplication, no new ideas. Hspa? The new frequency points are in line with the existing systems, carrying out load sharing, which will be useful in large business areas, but it seems to be early. Feeling finally is 10m+10m mode, take out 10M do LTE, meaning. What about moving? Nothing is not equal to anything, 30M of bandwidth can do a lot of things. So the urgent task of moving is to hold the 30M bandwidth, because after all, nominal only 15M of bandwidth. FDD, because TDD let mobile Ruyi: 2.6G include D band, should be and telecommunications have tacit understanding. It seems that the center of gravity of the movement must be placed on the LTE.