Analysis of the "modern war" copyright is not lost due to lawsuits

The latest news of April 7, Infinity Ward, a former legal representative of the company, Jason West and Vince Zampella this pair of partners in the case of the move to win the "modern War" copyright ownership, it is commendable.　　But Wedbush analyst Michael Pachter (with two law degrees) thinks they have no hope. The report suggests that a favourable ruling on mission and call could lead to the release of the new modern war.　　But Pachter said there was no legal basis for such a result. "West and Zampella are not interested in the copyright of Modern warfare," Pachter told Industrygamers's website, saying, "They have never announced that they ' own ' modern Warfare, ' instead, they claim they were developed under the authority of the employer. Modern warfare. "This is two completely different concepts, and their creative control of modern warfare is only effective when they are still employed by Intinity Ward, and once their employment contract is over, their creative control over modern warfare is over." Pachter added, "If they want to return to modern warfare, they could have negotiated with Infinity Ward, but they have confused two legal concepts and remedies in the balance law." They demanded the destruction of the modern war or the ownership of its copyright, rather than the claim of reinstatement. The law does not allow this to happen. It is unreasonable to give control of one's own products to unrelated third parties. "(Digging the shell net)