And ruthlessly pull down the tail of the broadband tariff monopoly

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest stationmaster buy cloud host technology Hall

First of all, I am not a mobile or unicom gunmen, there is no need to help them out, to divert attention to the so-called fixed network operators, so please have a similar view of the students to stop. The reason for this is that I am really aware of the problem now, and that is precisely what regulators and experts have overlooked, especially those experts who have gone to the consumer associations.

In the last two years, mobile charges have been the focus of experts ' crusade. Not long ago, the Chinese Association of Consumer Associations and some ministries for the study of telecommunications tariffs, Beijing, the experts once again proposed for the mobile phone "four cancellation" call, probably include: cancellation of monthly rent, two-way charges, roaming fees and various packages.

I think that the discussion of mobile phone charges has entered a dead point of the state, and will have to cancel, especially in some industries outside the so-called experts, completely cancel feasible? How possible, such as a variety of packages, the user needs of the breakdown and diversification is the basis for the package, if everyone is only a standard tariff, the result is what? The poor help the rich, the final result is simple, the people are the biggest victims.

And the fact is, in these years mobile phone charges have been greatly reduced, of course, I admit that in the roaming fee and monthly rental and other specific projects there is a great decline in space and irrationality. What is the reason for the decline? Don't you tell me the result of a government and association appeal? On the surface it looks like this. In fact, the most important thing is that the operator's competition has worked, the operator's initiative to reduce prices to fight the market contributed to the reduction of mobile phone tariffs, such as China Mobile, this is the most valuable.

When we stare at the mobile phone charges every day, but ignore another substantial tariff monopoly "hardest hit": Broadband access fees. In recent years, broadband charges have been hidden behind the mobile phone charges, no one too much mention. The government and academics rarely pay attention to the reasons, I think with fixed network operators have a lot of business predicament. Also, their income has not been growing significantly in recent years, and it is even falling, which is a good coat.

But the monopolistic performance of broadband tariffs is obvious, even is growing, I roughly summed up the following: 1, the past few years, broadband tariffs have not declined, such as Beijing, 120 of the monthly fee, seems to have been maintained for n years, and the same period, mobile phone charges have been dropped n times; 2, after the broadband speed up, Actually put forward based on ordinary ADSL higher tariffs, rather than lower the original ordinary tariffs, or based on the increasing number of broadband users on the basis of, I think, this is actually a kind of public provocation, mobile operators from Gsm->gprs->edge, have not heard of the increase in tariffs.

What's the reason? Mobile phone charges a substantial decline, robbed the fixed network voice business, all over the country, I have often heard the demolition of the home phone, keeping the voice of fixed telephone revenue, is almost impossible. Therefore, operators will be the main revenue to the new growth point of transfer, broadband is the only option, similar to IPTV value-added business income in the short term. And the result? That is, the monopoly performance of broadband tariffs does not fall, this is also, I would like to put forward the point.

This raises another question, your business condition is not good, the government or the common people can ignore or endure your monopoly high tariff, admits you can the child tariff not to drop. And some of the operating conditions and management level of good operators, must do their best to hit it? In pursuit of the so-called market equilibrium?

In my view, the primary option for allocating resources is to increase productivity rather than to protect it from being too backward. From this point of view, to the fixed network and mobile network assets scattered, redistribution, that is, the existing operators to restructure, is very necessary. (Zebian Admin01)