Anhui Huoqiu County 600 million incentives for private enterprises to provoke controversy

Anhui Province Huoqiu County decided to reward Anhui Dachang Mining Group Co., Ltd. 600 million yuan.　　This cause by the county Standing Committee resolution passed, seems to have been legally binding. This has been a controversial issue in the community, and there is a real reason to show some degree of "doubt". The report stresses that Huoqiu is a state-level impoverished county, with the implication that huge rewards pose too much pressure on local finances.　　Others say that the development of the great Chang mining industry is not clear, the government put Bao on its body, in case it failed to invest, how to do? Local leaders seem to have foreseen the controversy, and they gave the public an account: the Grand-chang mining project 1 million tons of spheroidal graphite casting projects, completed after the completion of the annual output value of 6.67 billion yuan, tax 589 million yuan, can solve 2500 employment. It seems that figures can explain everything.　　Then the Government's financial income, job hunting, is a fairly good deal. Investment is a great possibility of success, there is a huge possibility of failure, these are not said.　　May we simply assume that the investment is absolutely successful and that both the government and the residents can benefit from the investment and the government and the NPCSC can reward the 600 million? The amount of money the government uses to reward, whether it comes from budget or budgeting, is taxpayers ' money or other public property. The ultimate power to determine the whereabouts of the money belongs to the entire local population. A provisional budget, close to the government's annual revenue, is an important political decision that must be solemnly made. Regardless of the Standing Committee's approval of the giant prize, the government's proposal to send money to a private enterprise by the NPCSC is in itself contrary to political norms.　　A prize for 600 million yuan, such a generous, ancient and modern unheard. China's development is based on market economy, and a prerequisite of market economy is property right system. Under the modern property right system, the boundary between private property and public property is clear, and two kinds of property rights are different. The West has an extreme statement that "private property is sacrosanct", but in turn, it is not allowed in the west to give public property to the private sector.　　Given that the fiscal regime is in the hands of Parliament, the Government's money to private companies is unlikely to materialise in fact. The Westernization movement arose in the late Qing Dynasty, some places have a lot of factories and mines, the main system is so-called "official governor commercial". The government has part of the money and the merchant is part of the stock, but there is no way for the government to give money to businessmen for capital. The Qing government also knew that the Western government could resolutely protect private property, but could not give the public money to the private sector in vain.　　In fact, foreigners in the private property gifts, the government has to levy a heavy tax. The development of the economy, the private enterprise is indeed a major form of economic activity, and from the history of the Western market economy, the creation of enterprises, development, growth is the product of spontaneous market, the government does not have to intervene. To take taxpayers ' money to "reward" the private sector, and to turn the public finances into property directly, is an invention of some local governments, which violates the "international practice". The fundamental reason why the Government can be generous with taxpayers is that power is not subject to the rights and can do whatever it wants. HuoqiuCounty giant Award Private enterprise, is actually an administrative disorderly act. The public power can be disorderly as, some people imagine the possibility of the right money transaction, is logical deduction. 600 million yuan for nothing from the sky, the equivalent of a "no main property", there is a question of how to allocate a private owner is not consistent with "the way of the people". Everyone knows that there is a reason for the fruit, 600 million of dollars from the sky, the people who hold power is behind the scenes. With the first success, giving those in power enough incentive, there will be a second success.　　The most consistent with the "economic rationality". The suspicion of giving the public money to the private sector is clearly in line with rationality and rationality cannot stop doubting. We must resolutely stop illegal property rights, and to achieve this goal, at present can only hope that the supervision of public opinion caused superior intervention. If we want to solve the problem fundamentally, we can only start with standardizing power and safeguarding civil rights, so that the government purse is in the hands of the people. To a lesser extent, this is a legal issue; To say this is a constitutional issue. (Yang Uze)