Apple Watch is a watch expert on holiday travel essential wear equipment

Apple has finally unveiled its first smart watch Apple Watch in a recent new product launch. As Apple's first product in wearable areas, the outside world has placed a great deal of hope in Apple's Watch, but it does not have as many magical and powerful functions as previously reported. While everyone expects Apple Watches to show the way to the industry, the way Apple Watch itself does not seem clear. Benjamin Clemer Benjamin Clymer, founder and executive editor of Hodinkee, the world's leading online watch magazine, has been in the scene of Apple's launch and has experienced Apple's smart watch Watch at the first time. As an expert on the wrist watch, he conveyed to us the touch of Apple Watch first sight. Wei Feng today to extract some of the comments to share the following (the first person quoted below): I am not even sure whether we should call it a watch. Yes, Apple Watch does need to wear it on the wrist, and it can do the timekeeping for us, but it's just the same thing as Apple's smart watch Apple Watch and those classic manual machine watches. I was fortunate enough to be invited to attend and witness the release of Apple's first smart watch. After the experience, I don't think Apple Watch will pose any threat to premium watch makers, and I think Apple Watch is likely to replace the low price quartz watch, even some entry-level mechanical watches. Predictably, Apple Watch is likely to pose a greater threat to higher-end watch brands over the next few years. What's the reason? Apple's quest for Apple's Watch design details is more finely crafted than the equivalent price of Swiss and Asian brands, and this is the impressive essence of Apple's Watch. It also offers more advanced interaction and functionality than other smart watches, but it is still imperfect. At a price of 350 dollars, Apple's Watch overall design has made other smart watches a bit of a match, with the fluency of line design, the details of the description and the simplicity of the construction quality of the competitors. The edge design of Apple's Watch fillet is very apple-or even very newson, but it's definitely a hunch, and I'm sure Apple Watch incorporates some of his designs. For Apple's Watch audience, imagine a middle-class family that grew up with a good job after graduating from a prestigious school, a beautiful apartment in a big city, and perhaps a German car, occasionally rewarding herself for something beautiful and extravagant. Can you imagine how often he wears apple Watch? I don't think so. I guess he will buy Apple Watch, but further only according to the environmentNeed to wear, because Apple Watch is not a must, it can only be a choice. By contrast, the rich will almost always have an iphone 6, because the iphone is the best product in the category, but Apple Watch is largely out of the way, because there are a lot more brands in the Watch field than the Apple Watch. In addition, the biggest problem for the mainstream media is that Apple Watch has to rely on the iphone to fully implement rich features and interactions. Does it make sense to take the iphone if you want to jog? In yesterday's hands-on experience, I asked this question directly to Apple PR, and they didn't make a positive response at that moment. If that is the case, then hopefully Apple should make some more sensible corrections. For now, Apple Watch is definitely the best smart watch on Earth. But are we really sure that wearable technology is what we really need right now? Compared to the advent of the Bluetooth headset five years ago, there is a year ago the introduction of Google Glasses, and then look at the smart watches now, these are the people really essential things? who is able to popularize products for the general necessities, So far only Apple can do it. But it will take a lot of time to verify that Apple Watch to go public next year. Many people asked me if it was worth changing the Lang's watch to an Apple Watch. My answer was very pertinent, of course not. However, I suggest that it is recommended to treat Apple Watch as the protagonist of the weekend, or as a prerequisite for a holiday trip, or even to ease the work atmosphere in the office in Friday. We are impressed that Apple products are expected to make a huge living dependency on it, especially after using its operating system platform products. As a result, although it is currently not a direct conflict with the high watch watchmaking, it is definitely a strong competitor of the Low-cost traditional watch. When you realize that you don't need more, you have little desire to buy new products. At the lower end of the watch market, I believe Apple Watch is definitely a major threat to the brand of similar watches. At present, many users of high-end or big watch brands have not developed loyalty, these users occupy a large proportion, which will Watch Apple to attract users to create opportunities. In the present case, brands like Suunto should worry that Casio is also in the column, even if the top quartz watch Seiko is spared. Not only that, the Swiss mechanical watch is facing another effect from Apple Watch is its youthful and vibrant cool factor. For the age of 16, will they consider Swatch or prefer to choose Apple Watch? and 20-year-old young people who prefer to choose Hamilton or Apple WATCH. At the age of 25, do you want to choose Omega or Apple Watch? These should be things that Swiss watch makers can't ignore, because Apple products seem more appealing to younger buyers. Similarly, Apple is paying much attention to the details of Apple's watch design, which is clearly cheaper than the production of Swiss hand-machine watches. This is the most exciting thing for Apple Watch, believing it will push Swiss watch makers to launch a less than 1000 dollar mechanical watch and Apple to grab the lower end of the market, believing that it will be something that the vast majority of consumers would welcome.