Are all good employees leaving?

Absrtact: I believe that there is such a phenomenon in many companies, there are a lot of competent employees who are not appreciated by the company, so they choose to leave at the end of the one by one, and then the original company boss will know that those who leave are better paid than they give, and in the conversation with their subordinates, To understand the job performance and personality of the person who left the staff, but found in his mouth, the original job performance and personality is very good, then as the boss and managers how to use their own mind to accept the reuse of these can, how to use their own eyes to identify these talents for my use, so that they do not leave?

In fact, on this topic, I also have a lot of words to say, so on the blog summary of the Post also write their own words.

Foreign monks are good at chanting

How to define a good employee

Smart people have ideas, want to create their own more value, once the environment is not allowed to leave.

Let the fame and fortune in the staff

Leaders in the consideration of their own work performance, but also for the subordinate's career development to give affirmation and support. Moreover, not only the qualifications, the ability of the quality is not entirely in the length of education, but in the control of their own qualifications. Hope that the leadership can be an eye to know people, leaving the ability, pragmatic staff, leaving is those who have poor ability, not down-to-earth staff.

No guarantee of communication

Give the staff a good career planning, and make the lifting system.

Enterprises should have a transparent assessment mechanism, so that outstanding personnel to appear.

Because good employees need better development, but enterprises do not have a reasonable system and ability to retain them. In the final analysis, not the staff problem, is the enterprise's problem.

The establishment of a good reward and punishment mechanism, the ability to live on the problem is not, for excellent employees to take the initiative to reward, not necessarily have to wait for him to mention, because the general excellent staff more self-confidence, he felt as a good boss you should follow the rules to reward, or leave, excellent employees do not lack the position, do not have to ...

The problem is: the left is good staff, then the rest, it must be bad?

A good system should be: even if the people who go are excellent, we still have a lot of better people to do better.

Walking people may not be capable, even if everyone to his evaluation is very high, but one thing is certain, he has no way at least the initiative to find ways to communicate with his boss, let his boss know his ability. This is the most important factor in his failure: "The work is not from the east, exhausted and reactive" this sentence is not unreasonable.

I can not let his boss understand his ability, can only say that this person's ability is limited ~!

The key is to set up a set of incentives so that people who really want to be an officer can get what he wants. And the company in these people's investment is always worthwhile, they bring to the company is always much higher than you give him! As the boss is to find such people, and moderately in this person to invest!

Our company is a typical example, the small U.S.-funded manufacturing, the decision is the general manager of China. The annual pay rise is in accordance with the proportion of the general 5-10 points, many new arrivals after a few years or few, because the basic salary is low, no way to go, And a lot of salary from outside. The salary survey found that the market price outside the same position has doubled, only the general manager who has the right to decide is walking in front of the market! So, a good system is important.

There is an old saying that there are no unqualified soldiers, only incompetent generals. When I meet a good employee, I feel more like it. In the enterprise work, good staff usually want to be able to grow together with the enterprise, share to the enterprise growth brings the return, when such a demand is frustrated, may be the reason for these staff loss.

1. If leaving the company is not suitable for the company's system, model, culture of employees, although this group of staff personal quality is very strong, but because it is not suitable for the company, their departure for the company, the boss is not necessarily a good thing; 2. It is the company's misfortune to lose staff as a result of internal strife within the company, and the company must modify its systems, processes and responsibilities to protect these people.

Irreconcilable conflicts of interests between companies and individuals

The company is to achieve maximum benefits, the individual is also to achieve maximum benefits, 2 of the intersection of the less will be separated.