November 30, Farmer Spring Co., Ltd. Chairman Zhong in the press conference to display the same batch of products issued by the inspection of qualified reports. Xinhua News agency reporter Wang Dingji Xinhua Haikou, December 5 (Xinhua "Xinhua Point of view" reporter Chen, Bu, Hui Yu) 10 days, the farmer spring and the Unified Enterprise 3 kinds of drinks total arsenic content exceeded the news. The "Problem drink" test results appear to have settled, but the incident is far from over. Contrary to the initial inspection and retest results, the confusing law enforcement process, the public has not gone to the issue of many questions: why the industry and Commerce Department did not inform the business side of the results of the preliminary test? is the act of issuing consumer warnings ultra vires? The same as qualified authority testing agencies, the test results are diametrically opposed? The credibility of the functional department is impaired, who should be responsible for this? In response to these focus issues, "Xinhua point of view" reporter in Haikou exclusive interview with several of the core parties-Hainan Province Trade and Industry bureau secretary Huangcheng, Haikou City Trade and Industry Bureau deputy director Wang Jianlo and Farmer Spring Chairman Zhong. Provincial Bureau set up investigation team: must be accountable to the public reporters: from the Haikou Trade and Industry Bureau of the total arsenic content to all qualified, no one will think of "Farmer spring, reunification" storm in just a few days in a dramatic turn, then the business sector law enforcement truth is what? Huangcheng: December 2, the Hainan provincial trade and Industry Bureau set up a group with me as the team leader, the provincial disciplinary inspection Department to participate in the supervision of the investigation team, began to the industry and commerce sector law enforcement specific investigation. We have found a number of parties to talk, to be ascertained after the facts, will be accountable to the public, and according to the law to investigate the relevant persons responsible. As the chief leader of the provincial trade and Industry Bureau, I will conduct a profound review of the provincial government. We also hope that through the media to increase publicity, the loss of enterprises to the minimum, the consumer to the enterprise's product concerns to the minimum, the legal protection of operators and consumers legitimate rights and interests. Reporter: Haikou Industry and Commerce Bureau main leadership Recent changes is affected by this incident? Huangcheng: Haikou The adjustment of the Secretary of Commerce and industry is normal personnel changes, and "Farmer Spring, reunification" incident without any relationship. October 31, the provincial trade and Industry Bureau of the provincial government on the appointment of comrades in the notice, the reason dragged to the present, is to take the relevant provisions of the procedure. Authoritative test conclusion "fight" is normal? Reporter: Preliminary examination and retest result diametrically opposite, such phenomenon normal? Wang Jianlo: I have worked in the business sector for nearly 30 years, this situation is the first time, the feeling is not normal, but this can only be explained by the testing department. We only perform the market supervision duty, the preliminary examination and the recheck all resolutely obeys the examination organization's conclusion, and approves the retest conclusion is the final conclusion. Reporter: To the retest result, your enterprise satisfied? Zhong: I think the result, even if it is right, lacks legitimacy. We didn't sign it because we didn't know where the sample came from. I think this pass, may also appear next time not clearance. Journalist: What are you worried about? Zhong: I'm worried about the law enforcement process.。 The law enforcement process does not guarantee the fundamental rights of an enterprise, which, if disposed of randomly, is tantamount to extending another right indefinitely. Interviewer: How do you evaluate the exact opposite test results? Zhong: Perhaps Haikou city trade and Industry Bureau is also a victim, this is not farce, is someone planned, I think is deliberate. Now the test lacks a complete system, so it is to push the testing agency's legislation. I will tell you that the first sample detected by a higher level of testing agency is also unqualified. (Reporter Note: Subsequently, the reporter would like to be responsible for the first inspection and retest of the two testing agencies to certify the authenticity of the relevant situation, but the relevant person telephone always shut down or not to answer. Product sampling is there any "shady"? Reporter: Haikou trade and Industry bureau issued consumption warning, the farmer spring called "arsenic door" incident someone "behind the scenes", questioned the Haikou city trade and Industry Bureau sampling is for an enterprise. Is your sampling the normal routine sampling or according to the report? Wang Jianlo: This is a normal routine check, not for an enterprise. Earlier this year, the State Council informed the request to launch a crackdown on the abuse of food additives special rectification. October, the city bureau of Haikou in the area of supermarkets, shopping malls, farmers markets and other beverages to carry out special inspection, we randomly sampled at the normal operating point, including farmers Spring and the unified enterprise in Hainan Province and outside 35 enterprises in the 50 products, after the relevant formalities sealed, Sent to the Hainan entry-Exit inspection and Quarantine Bureau with the legal Test qualification inspection and Quarantine Technology Center. Reporter: You usually sample sampling to which testing organization? Wang Jianlo: In the past sent to the Haikou epidemic prevention station and the Hainan Province Quality Supervision Bureau of the relevant testing departments more, because this test project is more, some projects above two departments can not detect, will sampling samples sent to Hainan entry-exit inspection and quarantine inspection and Quarantine Technology Center. The first test results did not inform the enterprise is a one-time negligence or deliberately for it? Reporter: In accordance with the relevant provisions, the industry and Commerce departments should receive the inspection results within 5th, will notify the results of the sampling of people, to have a significant impact on food safety incidents, the city trade and Industry Bureau Why did not the initial inspection results to inform the enterprise? Negligence or intentional work? Is it knowingly? Wang Jianlo: I admit I was negligent in my work, but I didn't mean to violate the law. We have done this kind of spot checks before, many manufacturers in the mainland, telephone notify them not to recheck, we will only inform the merchant, did not inform the manufacturers. November 23, the staff of the test results report to me, I issued a request to the relevant industrial and commercial branches, gong and operators of the problem products temporarily off the shelf, sealed, waiting for processing documents. Huangcheng: In the end is the work negligence or intentionally, this is our most concerned about a problem, regardless of who involved, must be found clearly. If the Haikou trade and Industry bureau in the announcement before the provincial bureau, the provincial bureau will check the procedures, if the company and testing departments to inform the common recheck, the situation will not be in the wrong direction. It is also understood that the farmer spring has beenAfter reporting to the public security organs, we will fully cooperate with the public security organs for investigation. Issued consumption warning: the city trade and Industry Bureau is ultra vires? Reporter: Inform farmer mountain Spring and unify enterprise 3 kinds of drink total arsenic content exceeding the standard is a major food safety problem? Haikou does the trade and Industry Bureau have authority to issue such consumer warning? Huangcheng: Farmer Spring and unity is a large number of consumers of well-known enterprises, products such as the suspected total arsenic content is a major food safety issues, should be in accordance with the provisions of food safety law and related procedures, the State Council Health Administration Department, the Haikou City Bureau of Commerce and Industry apparently did not publish this consumer warning power Reporter: Who asked to put the product off the shelf? Who issued the consumer warning? Did you realize that there would be a certain amount of panic for consumers and the market? Wang Jianlo: I think the authoritative department to make the test results, trustworthy, then quickly off work, the staff said that there are 5 products unqualified, in order to prevent further spread of the situation, the business sector will be "problem products" hurriedly off the shelf. I didn't see at the end what businesses were involved, and that was an important oversight. Consumer warnings are not issued by me, in the end who signed, but also to go back to check. (Reporter Note: 4th 3:45 P.M., Wang Jianlo to reporters in a hurry to call, said there is a key fact to clarify, he said in the morning in the interview wrong, back to the bureau to check records, only to find that the consumer warning documents issued by themselves. "Responsible for consumers" can be a violation of the retest? Reporter: The retest results came out, the farmer spring but said do not agree, that the retest procedures again violate the rules, this is what is going on? Wang Jianlo: Say recheck again violate the rules, I don't quite understand. On the morning of November 27, I personally received the owner of the farmer Spring, please them to see the sample backup, I am afraid of the production of products, the team is not the same, so insist to use sealed in the confidential room of the initial inspection sample backup retest, but the farmer Spring Head in the afternoon did not come, and I am very anxious, so sent 3 comrades, to catch the last flight of the night, will be the first Test product backup to the China Inspection and Quarantine Science Research Institute of Comprehensive Testing Center recheck. Huangcheng: According to the regulation, the retest should be carried out jointly by the enterprise, the business sector and the testing agency. But the farmer Spring said that the first inspection did not pass them, do not agree to use the first check products back to retest. I think the farmer spring worries also have a reason, but Haikou Industry and Commerce Bureau for Enterprise and Consumer responsibility, must be as soon as possible retest results, so no farmer spring participation in the case of retest. The credibility of the damage who should be responsible for this? Reporter: Through the "Farmer spring, reunification" incident, consumers feel a kind of "kidnapping" flavor, what should drink water, to now still do not understand, Hainan business sector in this incident exposed what problems? What is the responsibility? Wang Jianlo: The incident has certainly had an impact on the credibility of the law enforcement department. The rule of law is our bottom line, market supervision is the duty entrusted to us by law, the law is a double-edged sword, we must carry out the duty conscientiously, and mustAct, do not act or disorderly act must take responsibility. Huangcheng: Haikou Industry and Commerce Bureau law enforcement procedure is indeed wrong. These days I have been sleepless, always reflecting on this incident in the end what the problems exposed. The biggest lesson is that it must be enforced according to the procedure. Hainan Industry and Commerce division of the law enforcement team has more than 3,000 people, the team has a person not according to the law, will be've, affecting the entire law enforcement department's credibility and image. Investigation to this end, the reporter found that the "Farmer spring, reunification" incident exposed a series of anomalies can not help but let people have doubts, the relevant departments concerned as soon as possible to give the public a more convincing explanation, to eliminate public concerns about food safety, "Xinhua point of view" reporter will continue to track.
The content source of this page is from Internet, which doesn't represent Alibaba Cloud's opinion;
products and services mentioned on that page don't have any relationship with Alibaba Cloud. If the
content of the page makes you feel confusing, please write us an email, we will handle the problem
within 5 days after receiving your email.
If you find any instances of plagiarism from the community, please send an email to:
info-contact@alibabacloud.com
and provide relevant evidence. A staff member will contact you within 5 working days.