Audit Commission: 22 cities in three years to mention 14.6 billion yuan low rent protection gold

Mense Tangwen Hu Haiyun from 2007 to 2009, Beijing, Shanghai and other 22 cities, a total of less than 14.623 billion yuan of low-cost housing security Funds (hereinafter referred to as "Low-cost rental Protection Gold").　　This is the findings of the Audit Office released yesterday.　　The report, "19 provinces and cities from 2007 to 2009, the government investment in affordable housing audit survey results" showed that the city did not according to the provisions from the land transfer net income to extract 10% of the funds as a low-cost housing security, the small amount of funds to reach the total survey size (29.679 billion yuan) nearly half.　　In addition, the report shows that, of the 32 cities surveyed, 6 cities and 4 counties will use the Low-cost housing guarantee for the repurchase of housing and work expenses, a total of 152.313 million yuan. Local governments are not enthusiastic about low-rent housing "Local governments tend to use funds to build affordable housing, because these can be sold, and low-cost rental income can only be charged, so the government is not enough."　　Sheng Chen, Vice President of China Index Research Institute, said to the first financial daily. As a matter of fact, the financing of the protection of housing has always been a problem for local finance. Data show that the 10-year period before 2006, the national investment in low-cost housing construction of the total amount of money only 7.08 billion yuan.　　Since then a slight increase in 2007 1 ~ November, the national investment of 8.32 billion yuan. However, enthusiasm from local governments remains low.　　In the Audit Commission two consecutive investigations, the Low-cost housing protection is embezzled, the proportion of funds withdrawn, low-rent housing policy implementation bias, has become the main problem of low-rent housing management.　　As early as 2007, the Ministry of Finance issued the "Low-rent Housing Security Fund Management measures" clearly stipulates that the source of low-cost rental protection, including the net income from the land transfer of not less than 10% of the proportion of funds, as well as from the local government and the central financial budget subsidy funds. However, the audit results mentioned first, that is, including Beijing, Shanghai, Chongqing and other 22 cities from the land transfer net income from the proportion of the low rent protection is not up to 10% of the problem.　　The report shows that from 2007 to 2009, the total number of these cities was less than 14.623 billion yuan. In Shanghai, for example, according to industry statistics, the 2009 residential land transfer of 92.59 billion yuan, non-domestic land transfer gold for 42.58 billion yuan, if the overall land market leasing implementation of cumulative, the current year's land transfer income can be as high as 135.17 billion yuan.　　and the industry analysis, the actual extraction of the amount of low-cost housing protection (not public) should not be 10%. The net income of land transfer is difficult to calculate "the net income of land transfer is the profit space after deducting the land cost, but this part is difficult to reflect from the external data."　　"A senior industry personage to this reporter introduction." According to the approved standard of the former Shanghai land Sale price, about 70% is the land cost including moving demolition, 15% is submitted to the country, 15% is classified asParty government revenue. "Although this is the previous reserve price formulation, the question which can be reflected is, what part of the net income ratio should be occupied by the 10% per cent of the revenue?" "The relevant head of the Audit Commission said yesterday that some economically developed cities land transfer net income base is larger, the previous annual extraction of low-cost housing security funds plus other channels to raise funds can meet a certain period of low-cost housing security needs, thus reducing the proportion of the extraction."　　In addition, some cities to land transfer net income has not yet made an accurate accounting, resulting in not mentioning or less mention of low-cost housing security funds. 150 million The old problem of embezzlement and misappropriation of funds is again appearing in this audit report. According to the audit report, among the 32 cities surveyed, 6 cities and 4 counties used low-rent housing security funds to buy back the housing and work expenses,　　A total of 152.313 million yuan, 6 cities in 34 projects using false declaration materials, such as the new Low-cost housing central budget investment subsidy of 61.29 million yuan. In addition, the survey also found that 18 cities to 2132 families do not meet the requirements of the rental housing rent subsidy of 4.1312 million yuan, the distribution of low-cost housing 533 sets, random check 22 cities in low-cost housing security families,　　13,200 households did not use the lease subsidy as a provision to improve housing conditions, but to other household consumption, which turned the rental subsidy into a "subsistence subsidy".　　The audit investigation is not only promoting the improvement of low-rent housing security system and policy, but also the process of promoting rectification. By the end of August 2010, the audit found that the misappropriation of low-cost housing protection funds of 152.313 million yuan have been all returned; Beijing,　　Shanghai and other 11 cities have been from the land transfer net income in the past year, low-cost housing protection funds 3.861 billion yuan, the use of false materials to take the new Low-rent housing central budget investment subsidy funds have been adjusted by the project or the way to complete the rectification process. "First Financial daily" annual subscription price of 360 yuan, the national postal Code 3-21, the Post Office subscription hotline 11185, the newspaper issued hotline 400-610-1010.