Beijing "Exam Bar" sued Hefei a website of the same name

Multi-Information Network June 8, according to the "Xin ' an Evening News" reported that the exam training information portal Beijing "exam Bar" recently a site of the same name in Hefei to court, and claimed 100,000 yuan economic losses, and 10,000 yuan notarization fees. The case was divided, and the verdict was not pronounced. May 11, 2004, Beijing Eagle Education registered domain name for www.exam8.com "Exam Bar" website. In August of that year, the website was officially on line, providing a one-stop education and Training service for college students, in-service personnel and other learners. 2012, Beijing Eagle Education found that Anhui new Emblem Movement Network Media Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the new emblem move) also opened the "Test Bar" website, service categories and content and Beijing "exam bar" very similar. Subsequently, the Beijing Eagle Education to unfair competition, the new emblem moved to Hefei high-tech district court. Eagle Education that the "Test bar" has become the education and training market well-known service-specific names, belong to their proprietary. New emblem move In this case, still openly to "Test bar" open the same name website, intended to steal the eagle education for many years to cultivate the popularity and reputation, access to improper commercial interests, is a typical unfair competition behavior. The new emblem said, "exam bar" can not be regarded as the Beijing Eagle Education Proprietary, it and tea bar, bar, book bar, such as nouns, with a public nature. In addition, the new emblem of the "Test Bar" is a non-profit website, there is no infringement of Beijing Eagle education business interests. As for the Beijing Eagle education of the flow and visibility of the evidence, the new emblem of the movement that its lack of credibility, water is large, can not prove itself is a well-known web site. In addition, because the Beijing Eagle Education Business scope, does not include the education content, the new Emblem movement thinks the other party does not have the legal recovery basis. The case is still pending.