Big MLM case involved in huge sums of money to be questioned police say no one can explain

This reporter Yu Dongming "Legal person" reporter Kang Dongliang Jiaha case three funds go to be questioned one is the verdict of the public security organs in handling cases of seizure of the frozen 108 million yuan funds.　　The second is the "leader" of the wanted or arrested to pay bail and fines. The third is about the 52nd to 57 period after the case of "payment".　　According to the statistics of 241, the accumulated amount of money to date is unknown. May 29, Shandong Jinhua Sea mega-sale case of the people involved Chen Zhichun (alias) was notified to the district police station for "reeducation through labor" formalities.　　That is to say, from this day on, he will become a "RTL offender". "A year ago, his bail was lifted and he was suddenly sent to RTL."　　Recently, the informer called the Legal daily newspaper reporter, that this is to retaliate against the informant, "kill the chicken to the monkeys to see."　　Prior to that, "legal daily" sub-journal "Legal Person" magazine published "Shandong first MLM Case: who circled the billions of dollars a draft, disclosed the Jinhua Sea mega-sale case process by" circle money Law Enforcement "," case is to run money "question, in the community aroused strong repercussions.　　A few days ago, this reporter in the case of the suspicious seizure of money whereabouts, as well as the incident may be retaliation, to the Shandong province Huimin County interview, the county Public Security Bureau and the court in charge of the exclusive acceptance of the legal daily interview, the first formal response to this incident.　　The capital of MLM case is questioned. The case of Shandong Jinhua Sea mega-sale is a social concern, and some of the "victims" in this case have been reporting Huimin County to relevant departments and media for several years. It is understood that Jinhua Sea Company is a production of health products, High-tech Enterprises, since October 2005, its production of health food "hi-many Ann" used a well-known marketing model of the world. The model is that each person as long as a one-time purchase of 10 bottles of "hi-many Ann", that is to pay 4470 yuan, the highest can be promoted rebate 8700 yuan (this rebate maximum limit was later revised to 6700 Yuan). This sales pattern makes the product's sales increase geometrically.　　Later, the Huimin police will be identified as MLM, and case investigation. The reporter learned that the Jinhua Sea mega-MLM case involving more than 260,000 people, all over the country, the amount of money involved is as high as 4.42 billion yuan. The single fine of $170 million is the highest record of similar cases.　　However, the case from the beginning of the detection, to the final sentence of three years, but never from the official news. December 18, 2009, the Huimin County People's court to the illegal operation of the crime, sentenced to Wang Wanquan and other 15 defendants ranging from one year to 6.5 of real punishment and probation, and to determine the defendant all illegal income and the seizure of the proceeds, stolen goods by the seizure, freezing organs in accordance with the law.　　January 29 This year, the Binzhou Intermediate People's Court upheld the second trial. In the case of the second trial, the informant questioned how such a huge amount of money involved could make public securityAuthorities to dispose of themselves without collecting the Treasury and reimbursing the victims? According to previous media disclosure, the reporting agencies "concealment" and "transfer" of the money involved in a total of three items: first, the verdict shows the public security organs in case of seizure of the frozen 108 million yuan. According to media reports, to the first trial, the police have withdrawn from the seizure, frozen passbook, bank cards in cash withdrawals of more than 87.02 million yuan, and to the second trial, the remaining amount of money is only 1.5 million yuan, and the second is wanted or arrested the "leader" paid by the "leader" of the bail deposit and According to the media investigation, the case has a total of "leader" 570 people, of whom the "leader" was arrested and wanted to handle bail, respectively, to pay 70,000 to 500,000 yuan margin and fines. Later, some of the money was directly concealed by the public security organs, and some people were transferred by individuals, the specific amount is still unable to statistics, the third is the 52nd to 57 period after the case of "payment". A media investigation said that after the crime, police did not release early warning information in accordance with the provisions, resulting in a number of "group leaders" to the money account, only a "white feather" payment account, in the period of a total of "payment" more than 50 million yuan, and such a loan account statistics have 241,　　The accumulated sums of money have not yet gone to the unknown. Earlier, the "legal person" reporter rushed to Huimin County interview, the relevant handling agencies in charge of the whereabouts of the huge sums of money did not make a positive response.　　Huge sums of money involved in the whereabouts of the problem, it has aroused the community's doubts and speculation. Response: None of this money can be said by the media reported in the case of the handling of the case in the process of "transfer" or "concealment" of these funds involved in the case, this statement is true? "Legal daily" reporter decided to go to Huimin County for further interviews.　　And just before the departure of reporters, and received the informant of the material, said someone was retaliation. June 3 Afternoon, the reporter saw Huimin County Public Security Bureau incumbent director Shi Jun. He introduced that he took office at the end of 2008.　　At that time, Jinhua Sea MLM case has long been the end of the investigation into court trial stage. I was shocked when the case was reported by the media. But to tell you the truth, when I took office, the police investigation stage of this case has already ended, has entered the second trial stage of the court, so the basic situation of this case, I do not understand. Shi Jun said, "I took office, in the fight against crime, public security control and team building, are unremittingly." A few years down, my bureau's achievements are ranked Binzhou forefront, the people's satisfaction and security continues to climb. The information disclosed by the media is incompatible with our present working conditions and achievements. I hope to be able to find out the question in question as soon as possible. "About the capital flow of Jinhua Sea case, I do not now." No one is going to say it and nobody can say it. "Shi Jun said," This is a criminal case of the end of the second instance, whether in the process of handling cases, or after the end of the case, according to the relevant fault correction system, the higher judicial departments and discipline inspection departments can intervene to review, timely correction, andResponsible person to be held accountable. If they come to the review, we will provide no files or even personal work notes to the investigators without reservation.　　"For the informer was retaliation, Shi Jun denied."　　Regarding the judgment that "the money involved is handled by the seizure organ according to law" in the Society, "legal daily" reporter interviewed the Huimin County People's Court president Tri Yu, as well as the case presiding judge, the tribunal President Fan Zijun. "Why does this seizure, forfeiture not collect the Treasury, or return the victim, but ' by the seizure authority to dispose of the law '?"　　asked the reporter. "We are in strict accordance with the criminal law and the relevant provisions of the Law of punishment, the sentence is correct."　　"Fan Zijun said. "Who will supervise the public security organs according to the law?"　　The reporter asked. "This is to ask the public security organs, we do not know."　　Fan Zijun answered. "For the public security organs to dispose of such a large amount of seizure and forfeiture, the Court has the responsibility to supervise its effective implementation of the law, or after the end of the implementation of the audit department entrusted to the Public security organs of the disposal of the audit?"　　asked the reporter. "On the question of how to enforce the property penalty," the Supreme People's Court recently made a judicial interpretation. However, there are no specific provisions on the enforcement of the seizure of the case-handling organs. Tri Yu said, "Of course, the judicial authorities to confiscate the money for the ' special audit ' is a feasible method, but at present there is no specific judicial practice, who should be entrusted, who to implement, and finally who to supervise, this is a field worthy of exploration." "Experts recommend the introduction of" special audit "" courts and other departments to exercise power on behalf of the State, if the final law enforcement results for a person, a department or a place for profit, law enforcement obviously lost credibility. " Yu Xiangyang, director of the Institute of Law, Shandong Academy of Social Sciences, said, "therefore, such as such a large amount of confiscation, seizure of money in the prosecution case, the process of handling the money to the problem must be sunny, open, accept the public supervision." "The confiscated income of the public security organs has two large parts: the first is to violate the People's Republic of China Public Security management Punishment regulations and the criminal, economic cases of economic penalties, such confiscated income is often handled by the public security organs themselves; Second, those who need to transfer the money seized in the prosecution case, these monies should be transferred with the case, After the trial, the court shall make a judgment and define its lawful whereabouts. "A judge, who asked not to be named, said to the law daily," once the previous fund is in a black box, it is difficult to monitor and clarify, after a courts of three reviews, trials and judgments, the basic can achieve sunshine. Such ' vague ' judgments as the Jinhua Sea MLM case are extremely rare.　　"According to the reporter's information, 1995, the National Audit Commission has issued a notice of the national courts organs for 1994 years of handling charges, confiscated funds and other financial revenue and expenditure of the audit, but after many years, no data show similar audit action. "It is a good idea to introduce ' special audits ' to the handling agencies, but the key is that such 'The special audit ' should be initiated by which supervisory organ and how to entrust it, which is still a blank in the current judicial practice. He said that in theory, there are many forms of supervision, such as the supervision of the NPC, the superior and subordinate supervision of the law enforcement organs and the public supervision, and the public security organs can be required to enforce the law effectively, but in some local areas, there is a lack of effective supervision.　　If there are no special cases, the emergence of special groups, these oversight is often ignored by existing laws and regulations, and this time, it should be the legislature concerned about and make relevant laws and regulations to regulate. Some experts suggested that the National People's Congress should introduce special laws to specify the scope and procedure of "special audit" of the judicial organ and the method of special audit. Before the law is enacted, the Supreme People's Court and the Supreme People's Procuratorate may also introduce judicial interpretations.