Billionaire wronged seven year end acquitted 22 million yuan national compensation

Regal Rodan.　　(Information picture) (reporter Showa) The 54-Year-old Hong Kong businessmen who have been in the past billion yuan Rodan former members of the former Dongguan CPPCC, previously because of "suspected contract fraud" was brought into the detention center, two months later, after the relatives pay more than 20 million yuan, he was released on bail.　　In January this year, the Guangdong High Court, the final trial of its innocence, yesterday reporter learned that Rodan has submitted to the relevant authorities state compensation application, compensation obligation organ is Guangzhou Procuratorate, total claim more than 22 million. When he returned to Hong Kong to act, he was arrested April 2001 China electronic Import and export Company (hereinafter referred to as South China company) and Guangzhou machinery and equipment Import and Export Corporation (hereinafter referred to as machinery Company) to the Guangdong Provincial Public Security Bureau report; January 2002, and reported to the Guangzhou Public Security office, said in the and Zhong Chang Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter called Zhong Chang Company)　　In the trade, respectively by the Chang Company issued 158 blank cheque fraud. March 2003, Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau Economic Crime Investigation Detachment of Rodan to carry out border control.　　April 7, 2003, the wealth of billions of Rodan chairman of the company, as usual from Shenzhen Huanggang port clearance to return to Hong Kong, the police suddenly showed his arrest card to take away, the reason is that he was suspected of contract fraud more than 20 million yuan. He was then taken to the detention center and stayed inside for 57 days, after the daughter paid 21.2 million yuan to the police, Rodan was released on bail. "Detention center on 20 million Yuan stub wrote ' above for Rodan refund money."　　Rodan recalls.　　Charged with contract fraud in August 2007, Guangzhou City Procuratorate filed an indictment against Rodan for alleged contract fraud.　　The procuratorial organ believes that in the process of trade with the South China Company and Machinery Company, Rodan and the company have cheated the property of the two companies through partial performance of the contract, and then, by changing the name of the company, filing for bankruptcy and so on, destroying the books, concealing the goods, evading the return payment, and allegedly contract fraud.　　Canton City in the trial found that: Rodan was born in Dongguan, Hong Kong residents, the original department of Zhong Chang Industrial Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the Chairman of the company). Since 1992, the company and the South China company and machinery companies to do business, the two companies to the company to provide light bulbs, ceiling fans, irons, electric fans and batteries and other goods, China-chang company to pay for the two companies. Later, due to the backlog of the company's goods, there is no capital turnover, resulting in the company owed the above two companies total more than 20 million yuan payment. Subsequently, the South China company and the machinery companies to the Guangzhou Intermediate People's Court and the Hong Kong higher courts, the two courts have made judgments, the company should pay the arrears.　　South China and the machinery company also applied to the court for enforcement, but the court in the implementation of the process found that the company has no property to carry out, so the case was suspended. After the court's suspension, in 1999, it was renamed the Tian Jian Company's former China-chang company filed for bankruptcy, and in the relevant documents on the South China company and machinery companies as creditors. 2001, Tian Jian CompanyOfficially bankrupt. September 8, 2008, Guangzhou, the first trial of the Chinese Academy of Justice, Rodan was accused of the crime of contract fraud evidence is insufficient, the charges can not be established, the verdict Rodan not guilty. September 19, 2008, the Guangzhou Municipal Public Prosecutor's office drew a protest, that the company and Rodan know that the ability to perform the contract, through the partial performance of the contract, the implementation of the act of defrauding the damage Unit property.　　Do not fulfill the sincerity of payment, evade the return of payment, with illegal possession of the money involved intentionally. is a normal trade risk to be acquitted this January 25 morning, Rodan received a criminal decision from the High Court of Guangdong province. "After investigation, due to the Gulf War and product quality, the Middle East customers defaulted payment, and other objective reasons, leading to the company in the late trade in both sides can not pay the purchase price." For many years in the performance of trade, Chingchang to South China and machinery companies have actually fulfilled most of the obligations. Among them, the Sino-chang Company and Guangdong Machinery and equipment import and export Group company in 1986 to 1992 accumulated trade amount of about 600 million yuan, Chingchang never occurred less pay, 迟付, non-payment of payment and so on. In the latter case, it is normal trade risk, and the payment dispute has entered the relevant civil judgment and the execution stage of arbitration.　　"Guangdong High Court also believes that Tian Jian company (that is, the company) to apply for bankruptcy, Rodan has verbally informed the South China company and Machinery company, can not be identified in the company and Rodan bankruptcy to evade the return of funds, destroy books records, the purpose of concealing the whereabouts of goods."　　Finally, Guangdong High Court found that the crime of Rodan guilty contract fraud can not be established.　　In addition, the Guangdong High Court, the Rodan relatives to the public security organs of the RMB 21.2 million, is Rodan relatives raised money, there is no evidence that the paragraph is the company, Tian Jian Company's money or the paragraph with the company, Tian Jian Company, not confiscated or used for debt is reasonable. Claim margin interest will be more than 9.4 million reporters were informed yesterday that Mr. Luo had made compensation to the state.　　Compensation obligation Organ is Guangzhou Procuratorate, in the application he made a total of 4 requests: 1. Was arrested from April 7, 2003, was released on bail on June 2, was wrongly detained for 57 days, and requested payment of compensation for this period of about 125 yuan per day, totalling 7149.51 yuan.　　2. In custody, the daughter to the public security organs to pay 21.2 million "margin", the money is illegal seizure, the claim for compensation for loss of interest more than 9.4 million.　　3. January 25 this year, Guangzhou Municipal Public Security Bureau Pre-Trial Supervision detachment returned 10.7 million yuan, resulting in property losses of 10.5 million yuan.　　4. Long-term serious insomnia, need to rely on drugs and psychological treatment to maintain health, put forward the spirit of the damage of 2 million yuan. The client "has not been so humiliated in this life," Rodan, in an interview with reporters. For nearly 8 years, I have been wearing a ' con man ' hat, the impact is very large, not only the banks do not dare to give me loans, business can not find people to cooperate, and even signed a contract before each other are destroyedAbout, all the ongoing projects are to be suspended, so that they will not only rely on low-cost sales to pay taxes, but also to the debt through the enterprise difficulties. And in the detention center spent 59 days, he even had to go as "rookie" responsible for washing toilets, brush the toilet, sooner or later, to know that I have more than 50 years old, I have not been so humiliated in my life! ”