Chan and wife Tan Jianqing divorce is misinformation? Or is it a means of transferring assets?

February 4, according to the Hong Kong daily newspaper reported that Chan and his wife Tan Jianqing married for nearly 20 years, in the case of a lawsuit after losing, there are reports that Tan Jianqing intends to divorce. However, Chan was arrested yesterday and was in the Deep Bay Yacht Club lunch with Tan Jianqing, and earlier there were media photos of the two of them travelling in the middle of the ring, so that the rumours of divorce were confusing, even more to the speculation of the transfer of assets.　　Some lawyers have pointed out that even if a couple is divorced and one of them is imprisoned or declared bankrupt, the court also has the power to make the maintenance allocation of the two sides invalid or to confiscate, and the couple may be sentenced to imprisonment for committing a fraud offence.　　Tan Jianqing has been dumb endure her husband's wife and Nina development extramarital affairs, but after the case, Chen, Tan intends to divorce, but yesterday afternoon Chan in the apartment before arrest, noon still with Tan Jianqing to Deep Bay yacht will lunch, love performance without reducing. Is divorce a misinformation? Or is it a means of transferring assets? Intriguing。 However, lawyer Shing pointed out that the transfer of private property through divorce was a common diversion but not necessarily successful. If there is evidence that one of the spouses is divorced in order to evade debts and transfer the assets to a spouse, the court has the power to award the spouse a debt. The evidence considered by the judge, including whether there was an unusual transfer of assets prior to divorce between spouses?　　Have the two persons commenced litigation on the allocation of property?　　Solicitor Deng Daming also pointed out that if there is sufficient evidence to show that a person is divorced in order to evade criminal responsibility and to transfer the assets to a spouse before divorce, the court also has the power to invalidate the maintenance or asset allocation agreement between the parties, and the parties are more likely to commit a criminal offence. He also pointed out that the transfer of private property by way of divorce would not be practicable, even if the husband and wife were to split the property through the court, and if one of them went bankrupt, the official receiver's office could still recover the debts from the parties or their former spouses.