Chan material will face false wills accused police research verdict (figure)

Chan, who maintains the "signboard" smile, was accompanied by a lawyer, Michael Maxim, who expressed dissatisfaction with the court's decision and decided to appeal. (Source: Hong Kong Ming Pao) Xinhua Beijing, February 3, according to the Hong Kong Ming Pao reported that the late Hong Kong Chinachem Group Chairman Nina Wang, the "first round" results of the 2nd, Chan was sentenced to defeat, more by the trial judge Lin Wenxian on the basis of scientific forensics, ruled that he hands 2006 years will be forged,　　Be criticized for not believing and talking big. Despite Chan's insistence on innocence and an oath to appeal, the police are studying the criminal prosecution of Chan.　　The kung, the helm of the Chinachem Charitable Foundation, which won the award for hundreds of billions of dollars, celebrated the evening of 2nd. Chan, in a statement on the evening of 2nd, expressed disappointment at the verdict, but understood that the case was complicated, but he remained firm in stating that the 2006 will had been handed over to him by Nina, and that it was true that no forgery was involved.　　Chan can appeal to the High Court before March 2, and I believe it will be scheduled for trial in the second half of this year. A police spokesman said that after studying the verdict, the attorney general decided how to follow up. It is learnt that the Commercial Crime Bureau of the Police has sent officers to the court hearings, and the first time the investigation was conducted on 2nd, "more than 300 pages of the verdict, the police have to look carefully to see if there are any allegations, whether they are criminal or not, and it will take a long time." Police said that there would be no arrests in the near future.　　In November 2002, Nina was convicted of a forged will and was arrested by police about one months later. Ms Audrey EU, a senior barrister, said that the Court of Appeal had less to overturn the court's finding of the truth or the credibility of the witness, and more would have made a judgement on whether the trial judge had wrongly used the principles of the Tribunal or expert evidence.　　She added that in the case of the final appeal, Nina won the turn of the day, and in gerrymandering, the final court has provided legal guidance for the dispute, believing that it is more difficult to find the appeal from the Lin Wenxian's verdict. In a 326-page sentence, the presiding judge, Lin Wenxian, pointed out that the key to the case was a number of contradictions in the 2006 will, as well as a conclusion by the handwriting expert that the signature of the Will was signed, and that Chan's resignation in court was untrue and that he had never intervened in preparing the 2006 wills　　Lin Wenxian also think, Chen love is not pure, the woman's desire to do good to death, and other reasons, all consistent point to the only conclusion--2006 will be forged, 2002 Wills is a valid document. The decision of the Fund won, neither from their initial feng Shui will theory, nor Nina's lack of health conditions to make wills, the Chan forced into a dead end, but he was suddenly surrendered in the case of the wills of the 2nd draft. At first, his lawyers even said that if the 2006 will was a forgery, Chen would be so stupid to hand over the draft to increase the risk, he can not be unnoticed to destroy the draft.　　This time it was "honest" and overturned 2006 wills. The verdict pointed out that through ESDA paper forensic technology, Proof of the 2nd page on the draft has 2006 years will 3 people signed indentation, and 3 signaturesMore than the 1th page position. However, witnesses Yongxiang and Wu Chongwu pointed out that there is only one page to sign the document, and in many instances, if there are two pages of paper, the location of the two-page signature cannot be "bit".　　ESDA also found that the 2006 will claimed to be Nina's signature, originally in the Will first folded before signing in the above, this also with two witnesses said, signed documents when paper never folded in the contradiction. The judge also believes that Yongxiang when he signed the document, he only saw that the document mentioned the donation of $10 million to Chan rather than the "all estates" referred to in the 2006 will, and the conclusion of the Fund's handwriting forensics that the signatures of Yongxiang and Nina in the 2006 Wills were high quality signs, It was finally determined that the 2006-year will of Chen's hand was forged.