Chengdu Business Daily: A magical mother defeated all Chinese writers

The annual rich List of Chinese writers, published by Wen/Shi Shi (famous writer, Yunnan province), has been controversial since its publication every year. This year, a new addition to the "most lucrative foreign writer in China, Rich List," writing "Harry Potter" foreign writer J.K.　　Rowling's 95.5 million-dollar royalties from China in ten years have brought us a huge blow. "Why do foreign writers go crazy in China?" Why do Chinese writers collectively not have a magic mother? ”...... Such questioning will eventually be entangled in the struggle between "literary value" and "commercial value". Around "What's wrong with Chinese writers?"　　"The topic is bound to start a new round of controversy.　　Some writers now look down on the "rich List of writers" who say they have nothing to do with "real writing". Here's the question: What is "real writing"? From the writing effect of the various "doctrine" and "schools" preached by our own critics, think that they have written the world's top-class works, but in addition to a one-time imitation of Latin America, two degree imitation of the United States, three degree imitation of Europe, and even imitate smaller countries in the small language writing, literary value of works, there is little or no trace. No one read, strange force of God, confined to the small circle of the works, is "real writing"? Then ask, what did the Chinese writer in the tens of thousands of writers ' Association write?　　Engrossed in the "creation of the text" of the batch of writers, there is no doubt that their own life to dry, but only an invalid thing? The question is: are Chinese writers rich? Look at the list, the Chinese writers team together, rumble the same superposition, but also to a J.K. Rowling！ More embarrassing, the number on the list is just her royalty income in China.　　How many writers, prolific, earn money but other people's books, but mistakenly think that our country, writers have become "rich", not people laugh? In today's era, no Chinese writer has seriously considered the relationship between literary value and commercial value. Some writers just learned to write, they began to look down on money, to create "great text", some writers have written a routine, close to the circulation, the writing into a "Save the manuscript" ... What's the result?　　Can not write a true literary value of the work, also cannot write the real business value of the work, not to mention the combination of the two? Conclusion: Where is the work with both literary value and commercial value?　　A generation of publishers had already shouted in front of the voice, the confidence to answer, as usual. Under Chinese cultural regulation, the writer seems to have a grudge against money, and when it comes to money, it will be scolded, but the problem is, money is always a market economy, always a standard? Said, "I'm not writing for money at all." "Every phase is vanity. "Sutra" said in the "phase" and "vanity", often mentioned, but it is their own comfort. So many writers in the Association of Super writers, first-level writers, two-level writers, three-level writers ... So many celebrities named the first prize, Lu Xun Literature Award, Mao Dun Literature Award, People's Literature award ... I didn't see a support for an existing literature.Value can write Money writer, sad, Chinese literature!