China's first game introduction infringement case trial

BCC network Beijing April 15 News (reporter Sun Ying Gillian) According to the Voice of China, "news late Peak" reported that this morning, China's first game raiders accused of infringement of copyright cases in Beijing Xicheng Court trial. "Gujian Tan" The copyright people think the book "Gujian Tan Authority Raiders" without permission, a large number of use of game screenshots screen, constitute tort, Sue publishers and distributors, claim 380,000 Yuan. For online gamers, the introduction is more familiar. Introduction to the game, there is a text version, there are illustrations version of the official publication of copyright owners, but also the use of private exchange players.　　Whether or not to use the screenshot of the game without permission constitutes infringement. "Gujian Tan" is a Chinese ancient fairy chivalrous culture game, because the plot is unique, the picture is exquisite, receives many game player's affection.　　"Gujian Tan" copyright owner Shanghai Candle Dragon Information Technology Co., Ltd. in the market found a book called "Gujian Tan Authority Raiders," the book, a lot of use in the game screenshots. Plaintiff: Without the plaintiff's permission and authorization, the use of nearly 500 of the plaintiff's copyright "Gujian tan" game screen, as the cover of the book and the content of illustrations, a serious infringement of the plaintiff's copyright, and to the plaintiff brought significant losses.　　Therefore, the plaintiff has brought a lawsuit against your court, hope your court can be judged according to law, support the plaintiff's lawsuit request. Candle Dragon Company requires the publisher Chongqing CLP Electronic Audio-visual publishing house, seller Beijing book mansion, Beijing Saint-Bure Digital Technology Co., Ltd. to stop infringement, apology and compensation for economic loss of 380,000 yuan.　　Chongqing CLP Electronic Audio-visual publishing house insisted that this infringement of the introduction of the game is other companies under the guise of their own name published, the plaintiff sued the wrong object. Defendant: We did not print the work involved, not to the public, and everything is done by the Oriental center of the Rainbow. And to do these things without the consent of Chongqing CLP, we are also victims. If we can sue a publishing company on the basis of the bar code and the name of the unit behind the book, we have to close the company. And why?　　Because none of our barcodes have taken protection. The plaintiff thought, the ISBN and the barcode is impossible to be obtained accurately by the other people, the defendant cannot prove that they said the colorful software technology company's true identity. Therefore, the plaintiff is not authorized to deny the defendant.　　Two vendors also said no liability, Beijing Book Building Reason is the source of legitimate purchase, the book has been involved in the shelves, and St. Bill company said that they do not have the ability to verify that the goods sold are infringed. Defendant: We are just a channel seller, not a distributor. Our company is a sales company, the sale of this product, the subjective intention we do not want to cause harm to the plaintiff. We are in the goods before, and Beijing network source Sheng Tang Entertainment Technology Co., Ltd. Telephone once communicated, this kind of products we can sell.　　At that time the result of telephone communication is: The product is not "official" words can sell. For the claim amount of 380,000 yuan, the defendant said not acceptable, "Gujian Tan Authority Raiders"The issue will also promote the sale of the game, the plaintiff to refute. Plaintiff: Chongqing in the infringement of the book is earlier than the original book issued by the plaintiff, so this also directly led to its preemptive step to seize the "Gujian Tan" Raiders of the book market, to our cause a major economic loss. According to our background activation statistics, "Gujian tan" game activation volume at the end of 2010 has reached nearly 600,000 sets, we now only advocate 10% or even 5% of the player to buy the "Gujian Tan Authority" This book, we assume that it issued only 20,000 sets, so that we based on the actual profit of 50% calculated this amount , I hope the collegial panel can consider.