China's wage gap is still serious than the 11:1 industry monopoly

"China's industry income gap between the highest and the lowest ratio in the year, the data released in the first quarter of this year showed that the highest securities industry is the national average of 5.9 times times, the industry's highest and lowest proportion of income widened to 11:1." "And about 1/3 of this gap is caused by monopolistic factors." "The proportion of our national income used to employ workers has fallen sharply." The proportion of labor compensation to GDP fell by 11.66% in 10, which seriously affected the total employment. "The above sets of data are referred to by the CPPCC member, Song, during the CPPCC's symposium on" Speeding up the transformation of development mode and restructuring and improving the capacity for sustainable development ".　　To this end, song Xiao Wu proposed to adjust the distribution structure to promote employment. Song Wu also enumerated several "shocking figures": Statistics from the National Bureau of Statistics show that in 1980, China's GDP growth of 1% can pull more than 2 million people employment, the proportion to 1990 down to more than 1 million, since 21st century basically hovering around 1 million, Some years are only 800,000. At present, China's employment elasticity is roughly 0.1. The overall employment elasticity of the EU region in 2007 was 0.78.　　From 1992 to 2004, the BRIC countries ' employment elasticity was 0.9, India was 0.3 and Russia was 0.2. According to the report of the distribution division of the National Development and Reform Commission, the total payroll calculation of 18 administrative monopoly industries, based on the average wage of 2007 years, can save 1/3 of the salary and benefits to accommodate 7 million people's employment.　　If the industry gap is narrowed to a reasonable gap in most market economy countries, the maximum and minimum ratio is about 2:1, and the saved wages and benefits can accommodate more than 10 million people in employment. The adjustment of China's industrial structure is slow. Can accommodate a large number of employment of the tertiary industry, in recent more than 10 years the proportion of long-term stagnation in output value of about 40%, the long-term stagnation of employment in about 30%.　　To provide more than 80% of the urban and rural small and medium-sized enterprises, financing difficult problem has not been solved for a long time. Song said that China's outstanding problem is that the comprehensive national strength has greatly improved, but the employment elasticity has been declining.　　We emphasize that employment is the livelihood of the people, to protect economic growth is to protect employment, to protect people's livelihood, but the economic work is often finally settled in the growth of GDP, local government is difficult to rely on investment-driven extensive economic growth model to get out. To this end, song Xiao Wu suggested that the recent and even "Twelve-Five" period of macro-control should be to promote employment as the primary goal, to adjust the income distribution structure, improve the proportion of labor remuneration in GDP, adjust three industrial structure, improve the employment of the service sector, increase the state-owned Capital management budget reform To accelerate the reform of the administrative monopoly industry, improve the financial services for the private economy and promote the development of SMEs. Song that this is not only conducive to the economic development model of the change, improve the level of consumer consumption, more conducive to alleviating the income distribution gap caused by the social contradictions, the realization of economic and social sustainable hairExhibition。 Source: Online-China CPPCC News