Coase Jingen Forged shareholder Signature two letter of agreement help

Financial weekly IPO laboratory researcher Jinja/Wen trial, Jingen has admitted that the Trade and Industry Bureau of "Equity transfer registration Form" on the "Lo Quannan" signature is forged in the financial weekly 177th C4 version of the report "Coase Wood was alleged forged shareholder signature, former vice-president four times sued issuer, Jingen denied",　　New progress has been made in the disappearance of 17% per cent of the two shareholders by Mr. Coase's forged shareholder signature. Financial weekly reporter after in-depth investigation found that the original case of the knot of the signature is true or false, has been confirmed in the trial.　　According to Lo Quannan lawyer Zhang recalls, the trial, Jingen has admitted that the Trade and Industry Bureau of "Equity transfer registration Form" on the "Lo Quannan" signature is forged, this testimony in the court transcripts can be queried. Although the client Jingen mobile phone continues to shutdown, Coase Dong-Feng also to the trial was not on the grounds of the court, did not respond to the testimony.　　But in the Middle Court's final judgment, the court did make some concessions to the authenticity of the signature.　　Since it has been confirmed that the signing of the equity Transfer registration form is a forgery, this registration form should have no legal effect, then why Jicisanfan's lawsuit result is Lo Quannan lose, Coase wood outright? Originally, as early as in 2004 Lo Quannan separation, the big Toyo Ink Factory and Lo Quannan on the two sides signed a party B two agreements.　　In the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court of Final Judgment book, the reporter found the reason.　　Two copies of the agreement into Jingen life-saving straw although Lo Quannan to this day, the two agreement, said he was not fully aware of the situation at that time, signed his name; but in black and white, the terms of the waiver of equity in the agreement are listed in clear, Lo Quannan have to wear. February 4, 2004, the Big Toyo Ink as party A, Lo Quannan as party B, signed an agreement, agreed to, because party B is borrowed shares, so party B voluntarily give up in the big Toyo ink and so on all shares, give up the shares for the return of the investment in the loan.　　Party A shall pay party B 630,000 yuan in a lump sum and party B shall no longer enjoy any shareholder rights and obligations of the company such as Toyo Ink. June 1, 2004, both parties signed a letter of agreement, agreed to party A to give up the loan to party B 2.09 million Yuan, party B gave up the pursuit of 630,000 Yuan party.　　Since then, there are no other disputes between party A and B.　　It was on the basis of these two agreements that coase turned the tables, even though he was accused of forging signatures, and Mr. Coase eventually won the lawsuit.　　The final judgements of the intermediate courts are shown, in the Coase change registration before, the Big Toyo Ink Factory and Lo Quannan as a party B on February 4, 2004 and June 1, 2004 respectively signed two agreement, to Lo Quannan in large Toyo Ink factory shares were punished and clear Luo Quannan no longer enjoy large Toyo shareholder rights. The judgement also stated that, even as described in Lo Quannan, large Toyo inks in the December 8, 2004 change registration of all materials are not originalTell me your signature, however, in cases where the two agreements and the resolutions of the shareholders ' meeting and the amendments to the Articles of association have not been revoked or invalid by the statutory procedure, in the case of the company, the plaintiff Lo Quannan no longer has the shareholder's identity, so the defendant's change registration of great Toyo Ink is not contrary　　does not cause damage to the plaintiff entity's rights and interests.　　Whether the forged signature is valid for the verdict, Lo Quannan and his lawyers were quite surprised, especially because the commerce and Industry Bureau could not be responsible for verifying the authenticity of the signature. Lo Quannan in the indictment that he is the legal shareholder of Coase, in the case of the plaintiff without the consent and signature approval, Mr Coase's unauthorized alteration of the shareholder's behavior is invalid, and as the registration authority of the Industry and Commerce Bureau on the basis of the audit material to make the approval of the change of the act is also invalid　　and requested the cancellation of Coase Wood in December 2004 has been approved by the Trade and Industry Bureau of the change in equity. But the appeal did not get the support of the Xiangcheng District court in Suzhou.　　The Court concluded that the applicant should be responsible for the authenticity of the material in accordance with the law. According to this logic, the Suzhou Xiangcheng District People's Court found that the application materials submitted by Coase Wood in the September 1, 2004 shareholder meeting resolution in addition to the "Lo Quannan" signature, but also covered with "Lo Quannan" seal, the registration authority in the application of Coase's review of the changes made after the registration, does not violate the laws and regulations　　The verdict was also recognized by the Suzhou Intermediate People's Court. The Rashomon door behind a forged signature is a seemingly complex case, which has been explained in the court's verdict in detail.　　But the verdict does not mean the disagreement disappears, the story behind the forged signature may be more thought-provoking. One of the most needed to restore is the history of why the signature was forged.　　Since Lo Quannan agreed, and has signed the agreement to give up the equity, why not find himself to sign, why by forging, copy signature means to sign the change of business registration information? This is a mystery, the reporter tried to uncover the mystery, but in the parties heard two different statements.　　Lo Quannan told the Financial weekly reporter, the reason not to sign the transfer of shares, because he was in the two of the agreement outside the Jingen promised additional financial compensation, only to compensate, he will sign to give up the equity.　　On this additional compensation, Coase Dong Feng explained that everything is in the written agreement, the agreement does not, that is in fact not.　　Obviously, there are no other compensation clauses in the two agreements. Lo Quannan was not surprised by Mr Coase's denials, who told the weekly newspaper that when the agreement was signed, only Jingen and Lo Quannan two were in an office and no one was present.　　When asked why he did not write the compensation in the agreement, Lo Quannan explained that Jingen promised to give him additional financial compensation as a price for giving up his equity, but the compensation could not be written in the agreement, citing the company's bad entry. This argument, because the Jingen hand machine, the reporter has not been able to confirm thatBut according to Lo Quannan analysis, Jingen know that he did not deliver verbal commitments, Lo Quannan will not sign, so forged the signature, around the Lo Quannan.　　The parties also disagree with the signing date of December 28, 2002 of the large Toyo Ink company charter Supplementary terms shareholder Agreement, which stipulates that shareholders for other reasons to leave the company, must also exit the shares.　　Lo Quannan, this proof of his resignation is required to withdraw from the shares of the Supplementary agreement department later stoppering went in, there is no sign of him, but the other side of the branch of the Secretary of the Secretary of the Secretary of Science and Engineering was found that this material early in the establishment of the great Oriental already exist, and is Lo Quannan Before the press, Coase Wood director of the Secretary of the chief Zhang Feng Call financial Weekly reporter, because in the silent period, otherwise he can put these proof materials open. Financial Weekly will continue to pay attention.