Comment: Did everyone misread the "shield"?

Chaobai SARFT began to deny its "block acronym" approach, said to be misunderstood by everyone, its intention is to standardize the use of foreign words. No one doubts their starting point, I used to be against the acronym, 2003 sent a thing, black and white, do not want to deny. However, the author of the opposition is not like Rob Fachang Li, Li whirl two axe front open, "Do not ask Guanjun people, all at the head of the queue chop."　　Sarft's practice is just as Li this bounder, because even the familiar GDP, the WTO and the like are also in their "Norms" list. Did everyone misread it? Yes, but if a ban can cause so many IQ ——— I'm sorry, "against" you first. The misreading of people who ——— not be so low, it is evident that this provision is worth reviewing. Impression, the ban is quietly introduced, CCTV announcer Road and the NBA used the "American men's Basketball professional league", so that everyone is baffled, and then "This is whose idea" is still very conjecture, and then the SARFT came out "admit". Not like other bans so splendid, swagger, think they have a bad feeling, there is a temptation to taste.　　What we want to ask is, CCTV from top to bottom "changed", explaining the sports host is obviously not accustomed to the slip of the tongue, and even Trump, and so on, and so on in the discussion of the real issue of the spill will not be deducted, the fait accompli is so clearly placed there, the so-called misreading of the "mistake" is embodied in I also can not remember the SARFT ban on the "grumble" how many times, others Haurai is also a low level of the State Department, so "guilty", really embarrassed. But I am not deliberately and they get through, nitpicking, but "small scold big help", the station actually still defend their position. Because they this unit level is not low, they speak more carefully, can not introduce anything, a little IQ ——— again ——— people listen to the wrong. Sarft like the ban is well known, the ban on the many are also obvious to all, if the people who have gathered, it must be spectacular. But also need to have a more observant than on what once in effect, which after the introduction of even their own actually also indifferent, which simply they did not expect to enter into force, and what is such as "shielding" a class of people in distress. As for my limited observation, TV corner ads, celebrity medicine ads, and so on, is still a big way, never to avoid temporary. Do not brake, continue to do so, SARFT should go straight after the previous Chinese Football Association, often become the target of attack.　　Of course, if they think that it is a great contribution to reclaim a land of free speech, then we have nothing to say. Sarft, after all, is a country's level of the executive branch, its ban is either not out, or prohibit, should not have a third way to go. The introduction of something, as if it is to add laughter to people, increase the point of reference material, where is its authority? How can you be serious when you really need to be serious? Nowadays there is aHot word called "ugly fatigue", should be from the film "mobile phone" in the "aesthetic fatigue" borrowed it. Yesterday morning's mobile newspaper said, "ugly fatigue" means that people in the real social life of the ugly phenomenon more and more numb indifference. SARFT's ban may not be yet ugly, but they should at least pay attention to their gestures. After all, once their ban is exhausted, it is certainly not good for the country's image.