Comments: Mobile phone Beautiful "but households" can not across

What's my number? This newspaper yesterday on the mobile phone Liang not let the transfer of the issue of the report, causing readers hot discussion. Some readers believe that since the purchase of mobile phone number, it should belong to individual assets, operators are forced to not allow transfer, very unreasonable.　　There are also readers who believe that the operator's approach actually protects the interests of a wider number of mobile users.　　Controversy 1: The value of the beautiful number is not worth? This morning, the reporter login Taobao, found that more than 200 Web pages are in the sale of three operators in Beijing's mobile phone Liang. An online shop has many beautiful numbers, one of the most outrageous price is tail 1234567 of the number, unexpectedly priced up to 350,000 yuan, "8888888" number of mobile phone number marked "bargain".　　However, the reporter saw, these prices are only a symbol, and no one to auction. The phone does not have any use features, the high price is worth it? Reporters interviewed more than 20 mobile phone users, most of them said "not worth it, they will not buy." Consumer White Tiger said: "Any number, the back three times are all remembered, and the number is not 8 completely not lap." In my opinion, buying a beautiful number is the rich have nothing to show off, there is no need. In fact, as long as we do not go to buy, those high water naturally disappeared. "In the phone number, all the numbers should be treated equally, should not have the beautiful and not the beautiful number of points." "The Ministry of Information Industry, Telecommunications Economic Experts committee Secretary General Yang Peifang told reporters, in any document, there is no provision on" Liang ", just because the consumer's preference for certain numbers makes the mobile phone number that contains auspicious numbers become precious," as the saying goes, ' It's expensive. " Operators have seen such a market opportunity to make a high price. This is actually playing the ball.　　"Controversy 2: But the household is not reasonable?" Since it is in accordance with the high and low price, the mobile phone number as a commodity sold to consumers, why prohibit the free flow of people, not to transfer and transfers it? That originally created the concept of Liang, it should be announced in advance, this number belongs to the ' non-transfer ' number.　　For Beijing Telecom's "but households" agreement, the people of the public expressed deep puzzled, that operators are in the use of scarce resources, to the consumer marketing overlord clause. One operator insiders said that at present three operators, or the Ming or the dark are in the implementation of the smart Phone no transfer policy. "We have been implementing this policy for more than a year, because the speculation is too serious, a lot of mobile phone users fancy the number in their hands, even if the very ordinary number they also want to increase the price to buy over." If you look online, they are very outrageous. We introduced this policy is to curb this phenomenon, standardize the market, after all, operators also have the obligation to maintain market stability. To this, the reporter interviewed the Flying Elephant net CEO Xiang. He said that from the mobile phone number management, "but the user" agreement, although the use of inconvenient to consumers, but indeed to some extent, to curb the price of the inverted number of acts, conducive to market norms, there is a reasonable, it can even be said that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages. It's just that a one-size-fits-all policy of "No" for all users is too arbitrary. "If consumers can be in the real-name premise, that they are not inverted number, then why can not transfer?" Operators should provide a channel to facilitate the normal transfer of numbers between mobile users, rather than simply restricting death.　　"Zhaoying J201 Zhou Yu dozen gai, would like to play with a string bi son: Should limit the transfer, some young people will buy beautiful number do useless comparisons, waste parents money."　　Peas: Money on the Turn Bai, more than the burn! Liu: Liang and ordinary number no difference, as telecommunications is not the power to control the sale of customer power.　　The number bought is mine, in the absence of any arrears and defaults, the customer has the right to transfer the number.　　Li Kai: Are you going to tax the transfer income? Jiang has three: should be the relationship between supply and demand is the market decision, you have to tube, only that you have too many people, to meet the monopoly industry power desire.　　Sheng Ping: Does telecommunications think too much? Lake Heart: Zhou Yu dozen Gai, a willing to fight, a willing to get, telecom to limit, the blow is deserved.